Османская Венгрия

Alexy

Цензор
А на подвластной непосредственно туркам венгреской территории города захирели?

Или наоборот некоторые города разрослися?

Были ли там значительные поселения греков и армян?
 

Alexy

Цензор
А я про времена турецкой окупации спрашиваю
Кроме того диаспорные греки и армяне - это же трговцы (и ремесленники?), а не крестьяне
 

Rzay

Дистрибьютор добра
Вплоть до конца XVI в. все потери и разрушения, причиняемые турецкой оккупацией, представлялись восстановимыми. К концу долгой войны (1593-1606гг.) стало совершенно ясно, что Венгрия никогда не станет тем, чем могла бы стать, при определенных оговорках, по своим потенциальным возможностям. В отличие от прежних кампаний, большие войсковые соединения турецкой армии теперь не возвращались домой, а оставались в стране на период всей войны. Среди них были и вспомогательные татарские части, отличавшиеся особой жестокостью и ко времени подписания мирного договора опустошившие территории своего пребывания. Система прежнего расселения жителей пришла в полный упадок. Разрушенные деревни и села не восстанавливались. Население страны резко уменьшилось, и то, что не смогла сделать война, было довершено повторявшимися эпидемиями чумы, которая, вспыхнув впервые в 1620 г., в течение полувека оставалась эндемической для Венгрии.

Вместе с окончанием аграрного бума и последующим резким падением доходов от основных статей венгерского экспорта, которое и при нормальных условиях могло бы вызвать очень большие трудности, война привела к экономическому упадку и к исчезновению торгово-производственных групп населения, которые столь энергично формировались в течение предшествовавших десятилетий. Теперь они не могли конкурировать не только с компаниями-монополистами, финансируемыми из государственной казны, но и с «греческими» купцами, приезжавшими из Османской империи с куда более скромными капиталами. Таким образом, важный или, пожалуй, самый многообещавший путь модернизации социальной структуры Венгрии оказался в значительной мере заблокированным. Крестьянину, чтобы выбиться в люди, оставался только один путь войти в привилегированное сословие либо купив за умеренную плату патент на дворянство, либо выслужив его на воинском поприще в гарнизоне или же подразделении гайдуков. Вследствие этого тенденция к излишней многочисленности дворянства при слабой развитости «средних сословий», и прежде наличествовавшая в венгерском обществе, в XVII в. только усилилась, оказав очень глубокое и долговременное воздействие на господствовавшую систему ценностей.

С демографической точки зрения последствия войны оказались необратимыми. Это относилось не только к численности и плотности населения, но и к его этническому составу. Средневековое Венгерское королевство было многонациональной страной, где почти 20% граждан не являлись венграми. Большинство его этнических меньшинств проживало на окраинах государства, тогда как центральные регионы были почти исключительно венгероязычными. Однако именно центральные регионы оказались основным театром военных действий, и, следовательно, этнический баланс начал меняться в пользу других национальностей: словаков на севере, румын на востоке, сербов на юге. Образовалось пестрое смешение культур. Примесь православных элементов к римско-католическим, а также наличие протестантского субстрата имели куда более определяющее воздействие на общий облик венгерской культуры, чем несколько заимствованных турецких слов, какие-то блюда из турецкой кухни, здания бань и мечетей, оставленных турками. Однако все эти приобретения имели следствием такие противоречия, которые оказались неразрешимыми с наступлением Нового времени. Все предпосылки возникновения проблемы национального самосознания в Венгрии в период становления национальных государств в Центральной и Восточной Европе были заложены в столетие распада страны, которое началось с Пятнадцатилетней войны.

Мирные договоры закрепили политическое разделение Венгрии. С этим надо было считаться и по трезвом размышлении признать, что ситуация носит долговременный характер. И следовательно, необходимо было искать положительные стороны даже в этой суровой реальности. Политический опыт, накопленный за годы войны, показал, что у венгерской элиты из различных провинций имелся хоть и труднореализуемый, но все-таки шанс успешно балансировать между двумя великими державами. Габсбурги способны были обеспечить королевской Венгрии необходимую внешнюю поддержку, чтобы сдерживать экспансию Османской империи. В то же время Трансильвания могла, в случае необходимости обратившись за помощью к Порте, помешать Габсбургам проводить в королевской Венгрии политику удушения венгерского дворянства. Такой расклад редко поддерживался осознанно. Мешали различия в политических взглядах, враждебность и взаимная подозрительность обеих сторон, разделенных внутренней границей. В результате венгерские политики часто сбивались с этого очень узкого пути, что имело печальные последствия.
http://allstude.ru/Istoriya/Vengriya_v_per...ie_raspada.html
 

Kryvonis

Цензор
Греки там были. Причем еще с XV в. Многочисленной греческая диаспора в Венгрии стала только в XVII в. и XVIII в. на который пришелся пик греческих переселений на территорию Венгрии.
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%93%D1%80%...%80%D0%B8%D0%B8
http://www2.fhw.gr/projects/migration/15-1...ral_europe.html
http://www2.fhw.gr/projects/migration/15-19/gr/v2/mayar.html
Армяне присутствовали в Венгрии. Там было две волны миграции - XIII в. и XVII в.
http://www.noev-kovcheg.ru/mag/2010-08/2159.html
http://analitika.at.ua/news/2009-07-27-11300
http://diaspora-world.info/index.php?optio...emid=22&lang=ru
 

Alexy

Цензор
Вместе с окончанием аграрного бума и последующим резким падением доходов от основных статей венгерского экспорта, которое и при нормальных условиях могло бы вызвать очень большие трудности, война привела к экономическому упадку и к исчезновению торгово-производственных групп населения, которые столь энергично формировались в течение предшествовавших десятилетий. Теперь они не могли конкурировать не только с компаниями-монополистами, финансируемыми из государственной казны, но и с «греческими» купцами, приезжавшими из Османской империи с куда более скромными капиталами
А непосредственно до 15-летней войны 1591-1606 гг (т е тоже уже при турках) Венгрия, получается, хорошо развивалась в аграрном и перерабатывающем и экспортном плане?
 

Rzay

Дистрибьютор добра
А непосредственно до 15-летней войны 1591-1606 гг (т е тоже уже при турках) Венгрия, получается, хорошо развивалась в аграрном и перерабатывающем и экспортном плане?
Судя по представленному материалу - именно так. Пишут, что чуть ли не всю Европу мясом кормила.
 

Kryvonis

Цензор
Budin Eyalet (also known as Province of Budin / Buda or Pashaluk of Budin / Buda; Ottoman Turkish: Eyâlet-i Budin, Modern Turkish: Budin Eyaleti, Hungarian: Budai vilajet, Serbian: Budimski vilajet or Будимски вилајет, Croatian: Budimski vilajet)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budin_Eyalet
Eğri Eyalet (Ottoman Turkish: Eyâlet-i Egir, Modern Turkish: Eğri Eyaleti,[1] Hungarian: Egri ejálet, Serbian: Jegarski ejalet or Јегарски ејалет) or Pashaluk of Eğri was an administrative unit of the Ottoman Empire formed in 1596 with its capital at Eğri (Hungarian: Eger).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egir_Eyalet
The Eyalet of Sigetvar (Turkish: Sigetvar Eyaleti;[2] Hungarian: Szigetvári vilájet; Croatian: Sigetvarski vilajet) was formed in c. 1596 and existed until 1600. It included parts of present-day Hungary and Croatia. The capital was Szigetvár. It was later transferred to Kanije Eyalet.
Kanije Eyalet
The Kanije Eyalet (Ottoman Turkish: Eyalet-i Kanije; Modern Turkish: Kanije Eyaleti; Hungarian: Kanizsai ejálet; Croatian: Kaniški ejalet) was an administrative unit of the Ottoman Empire formed in 1600 and existing until the collapse of Ottoman rule in Central Europe after 1686 (nominally to 1699).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanije_Eyalet
The Province of Temeşvar (also Temeşvar Eyalet or Eyalet-i Temeşvar) was a first-level administrative unit (eyalet) of the Ottoman Empire located in the Banat region of Central Europe. Besides Banat, the province also included area north of the Mureş River, part of the Crişana region. Its territory is now divided between Hungary, Romania, and Serbia. Its capital was Temeşvar (Romanian: Timişoara).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teme%C5%9Fvar_Eyalet
Varat Eyalet (also known as Pashaluk of Varat or Province of Varat
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varat_Eyalet
 

Kryvonis

Цензор
Ottoman Hungary 1541 - 1686
http://www.worldstatesmen.org/Hungary.htm#Ottoman
[Ottoman Empire flag 1517 - 1793]

29 Aug 1541 - 26 Jan 1699 Hungary partitioned between Austria and Ottoman Empire,
Austria rules neighboring border areas, southern and central
Hungary under Ottoman rule; on 2 Sep 1686 Austrian forces
occupy Buda and Pest.


Beylerbeys of Buda (Ofen)
Sep 1541 - Feb 1542 Suleiman Pasha
Feb 1542 - May 1543 Kücük Bali Beg
16 May 1543 - Aug 1548 Yahyapashazade Muhammad Pasha (d. 1548)
Sep 1548 - May 1551 Kasim Pasha (1st time)
May 1551 - Aug 1553 Hadim Ali Pasha (1st time)
2 Oct 1553 - 23 Feb 1556 Tuighun Pasha (1st time)
23 Feb 1556 - 14 Feb 1557 Hadim Ali Pasha (2nd time)
14 Feb 1557 - 6 Aug 1557 Hadji Muhammad Pasha
19 Aug 1557 - 4 Nov 1558 Kasim Pasha (2nd time)
4 Nov 1558 - Jun 1559 Tuighun Pasha (2nd time)
21 Jun 1559 - Nov 1563 Gürildche Rustem Pasha (d. 1563)
18 Nov 1563 - Jun 1564 Sal Mahmud Pasha
Jun 1564 - Jul 1564 Hasan Beg (acting)
(governor of Gran)
Jul 1564 - Nov 1564 Arslan Beg (acting)
(governor of Semendria)
Oct 1564 - 19 May 1565 Iskender Pasha
19 May 1565 - 3 Aug 1566 Arslan Pasha
3 Aug 1566 - 1 Oct 1578 Sokollu Mustafa Pasha
Oct 1578 - May 1580 Kara Uveis Pasha (d. 1591)
May 1580 - 9 Oct 1583 Kalailisof Ali Pasha (1st time)
9 Oct 1583 - May 1586 Frenk Yusuf Pasha (1st time)
May 1586 - 22 Feb 1587 Kalailisof Ali Pasha (2nd time)
Mar 1587 - 28 Nov 1588 Frenk Yusuf Pasha (2nd time)
29 Nov 1588 - Sep 1590 Ferhad Pasha
Nov 1590 - 31 Jan 1592 Sufi Sinan Pasha
31 Jan 1592 - 28 Jan 1593 Sinanpashazade Muhammad Pasha
(1st time)
Jan 1593 - Aug 1594 Muhammadpashazade Vesir Hasan
Sokollu
Aug 1594 - 9 May 1595 Sinanpashazase Muhammad Pasha
(2nd time)
9 May 1595 - Aug 1595 Michalioglu Ahmed Pasha (1st time
Aug 1595 - May 1596 Sufi Sinan Pasha
May 1596 - 13 Oct 1596 Michalioglu Ahmed Pasha (2nd time)
Oct 1596 - 31 Jan 1597 Ali Pasha
Feb 1597 - 11 Oct 1598 Michalioglu Ahmed Pasha (3rd time)
11 Oct 1598 - Aug 1599 Diw Suleiman Pasha
Aug 1599 - Nov 1599 Teriali Hasan Pasha (1st time) (d. 1614)
Nov 1599 - Sep 1600 Lala Muhammad Pasha (1st time)
Sep 1600 - Apr 1601 Teriali Hasan Pasha (2nd time) (s.a.)
Apr 1601 - 15 Oct 1601 Mankirkushi Muhammad Pasha
15 Oct 1601 - Jul 1602 Lala Muhammad Pasha (2nd time)
Jul 1602 - Aug 1604 Kadizade Ali Pasha (1st time)
Aug 1604 - May 1605 Begtash Pasha
May 1605 - Oct 1605 Mustafa Pasha
12 Oct 1605 - 28 Nov 1609 Kadizade Ali Pasha (2nd time)
28 Nov 1609 - Jan 1614 Teriali Hasan Pasha (3rd time) (s.a.)
Feb 1614 - 17 Oct 1614 Sefer Pasha
17 Oct 1614 - Dec 1616 Kadizade Ali Pasha (3rd time)
3 Dec 1616 - Jun 1617 Sufi Muhammad Pasha (1st time)(d. 1626)
3 Jun 1617 - 6 May 1618 Rassash Hasan Pasha
6 May 1618 - Feb 1621 Karakash Muhammad Pasha
Feb 1621 - 9 Dec 1621 Sufi Muhammad Pasha (2nd time)
9 Dec 1621 - Feb 1622 Kena'an Pasha
Feb 1622 - 14 Oct 1622 Sufi Muhammad Pasha (3rd time)
14 Oct 1622 - Oct 1622 Deli Derwish Pasha
Nov 1622 - Sep 1623 Sufi Muhammad Pasha (4th time)
Sep 1623 - Oct 1623 Beber Muhammad Pasha
Oct 1623 - Aug 1626 Sufi Muhammad Pasha (5th time)
Aug 1626 - Feb 1630 Murtaza Pasha
Feb 1630 - Oct 1631 Adchem Hasan Pasha
Oct 1631 Bairam Pasha
Oct 1631 - 30 Jun 1634 Musa Pasha (1st time)
30 Jun 1634 - Jul 1634 Husein Pasha
Jul 1634 Musa Pasha (2nd time)
Jul 1634 - 29 May 1635 Jafar Pasha (d. 1635)
29 May 1635 - Feb 1637 Nasuhpashazade Husein Pasha
20 Feb 1637 - 23 Feb 1638 Musa Pasha (3rd time)
23 Feb 1638 - 5 Feb 1639 Tabani Yassi Muhammad Pasha
5 Feb 1639 - 19 Feb 1640 Ipshir Mustafa Pasha
19 Feb 1640 - 21 Feb 1640 Silihdar Mustafa Pasha
Feb 1640 - 12 Mar 1644 Musa Pasha (4th time)
12 Mar 1644 - Oct 1644 Osman Pasha
Oct 1644 - 11 Aug 1645 Deli Hussein Pasha
11 Aug 1645 - 9 Sep 1646 Nakash Mustafa Pasha
9 Sep 1646 - 2 Nov 1647 Murtaza Pasha
2 Nov 1647 - 5 Nov 1647 Hamzapashazade Muhammad Pasha (d. 1658)
(1st time)
5 Nov 1647 - Nov 1647 Vesir Fazil Pasha
Nov 1647 - 30 Mar 1648 Hamzapashazade Muhammad Pasha (s.a.)
(2nd time)
30 Mar 1648 - 6 Aug 1650 Siawush Pasha (d. 1656)
6 Aug 1650 - 9 Sep 1653 Murad Pasha
9 Sep 1653 - 11 Sep 1655 Saari Kena'an Pasha (d. 1655)
Sep 1655 - 2 May 1656 Gurdji Kena'an Pasha (1st time)
2 May 1656 - 20 Nov 1656 Fazil Pasha
20 Nov 1656 - 12 Nov 1658 Gurdji Kena'an Pasha (2nd time)
12 Nov 1658 - Dec 1658 Deli Husein Pasha
3 Dec 1658 - Jun 1659 Gurdji Kena'an Pasha (3rd time)
21 Mar 1659 - 28 May 1660 Deli Sidi Ahmed Pasha
28 May 1660 - Feb 1663 Bosnak Ismail Pasha
Feb 1663 - May 1663 Gurdji Muhammad Pasha (1st time) (d. 1666)
May 1663 - 20 Oct 1664 Sari Husein Pasha (d. 1683)
20 Oct 1664 - Mar 1666 Vesir Gurdji Muhammad Pasha (s.a.)
(2nd time)
7 Apr 1666 - 22 May 1667 Djerrah Kasim Pasha
19 May 1667 - 22 Oct 1667 Sohrab Muhammad Pasha
28 Oct 1667 - 30 Oct 1670 Mahmud Pasha
30 Oct 1670 - Feb 1672 Arnavut Usun Ibrahim Pasha (d. 1683)
(1st time)
Feb 1672 - 13 Apr 1673 Cambuladzade Husein Pasha
13 Apr 1673 - 14 Sep 1675 Arnavut Usun Ibrahim Pasha (s.a.)
(2nd time)
14 Jun 1675 - Mar 1677 Sirjolji Ali Pasha
Mar 1677 - Oct 1677 Halil Pasha
Oct 1677 - 14 Sep 1683 Arnavut Usun Ibrahim Pasha (s.a.)
(3rd time)
14 Sep 1683 - 10 Aug 1684 Kara Muhammad Pasha (d. 1684)
Aug 1684 - Nov 1684 Shaitan Ibrahim Pasha
Nov 1684 - 1 Sep 1686 Arnavut Abdi Abdurrahman Pasha
 

Kryvonis

Цензор
Prelude: The Disintegration of Medieval Hungary
http://mek.niif.hu/03400/03407/html/99.html
On 29 August 1526, at Mohács, Sultan Suleiman's army inflicted a decisive defeat on the Hungarian forces. Hungary's youthful king, Louis II (Jagiello), fell in battle, as did many of his soldiers. The Ottomans proceeded to invest and ransack the royal capital of Buda and occupied the Szerémség, then withdrew from Hungary. The last three months of the year were marked by a vacuum of power: political authority was in a state of collapse, yet the victors chose not to impose their rule.

Two candidates stepped into the breech. One was John Szapolyai, Transylvania's voivode, and Hungary's most prominent aristocrat; the other, the Austrian Archduke Ferdinand Habsburg, who was the late king's brother-in-law and the brother of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles V. Their contest for power would determine the course of Hungary's history, and that of Transylvania as well, for the region's fate was intimately tied in these crucial decades to that of the mother country.

The majority of Hungary's ruling elite backed Szapolyai, who for fifteen years had been playing a leading role in Hungarian political life. Part of the aristocracy acknowledged his leadership, and he enjoyed the enthusiastic support — not always reciprocated — of the lesser nobility. Most of his opponents succumbed at Mohács: the Hungarian branch of the Jagiello dynasty became defunct, and its pro-Habsburg following was decimated.

{1-594.} A small minority of aristocrats sided with Ferdinand. The German dynasty's main argument — one that many historians would judge to be decisive — was that it could assist Hungary against the Ottomans, although, in 1526, the promise rang empty. Hungary had been fighting the Ottomans for over a century, during which time the German Empire and the Habsburg dynasty had offered much encouragement but no tangible help. The likelihood of assistance was further reduced by the conflict of Ferdinand's older brother, Emperor Charles V and the French King Francis I that once again flared into open war in the summer of 1526. This circumstance led the voivode to discount the threat lurking behind the Habsburgs' candidacy: that Hungary would have to contend not only with the Ottomans, but also with an attack from the west.

Thus Szapolyai took no notice of his rival's protests, nor of those voiced by the few Hungarians who rallied to Ferdinand. On 10 November 1526, Szapolyai had himself proclaimed king by the diet at Székesfehérvár, and he was duly crowned the next day.

Profiting from nine months of relative calm, King John I strove to restore state authority. He drew on his vast private wealth, the unconditional support of the lesser nobility, and the assistance of some aristocrats to impose his policies in domestic affairs. However, in the crucial sphere of foreign relations, success eluded him. He sought an entente with the Habsburgs, proposing to form an alliance against the Ottomans, but Archduke Ferdinand, who had himself elected king by a rump diet in December 1526, rejected all attempts at reconciliation. Hungary's envoys fanned out across Europe in quest of support. Only in France did they find a positive response, but even that was ineffective since Francis I was intent not on reconciling Hungary and the Habsburgs, but on drawing Hungary into a war against Charles V and his family.

Europe's political balance underwent a major shift in the summer of 1527, when, in a somewhat unplanned operation, mercenary forces of the emperor occupied Rome and drove the Pope, one of {1-595.} France's principal allies, to capitulate. This development freed Ferdinand — who also acquired the Czech throne in late 1526 — from the burden of assisting his brother. By then, Ferdinand had developed a Hungarian policy that was fully in keeping with the interests of his realms. He judged that if Hungary, unable to resist the Ottomans, took action independently of Austria and Bohemia, it might well enter into an alliance with the preponderant Ottoman empire against its western neighbours. It was therefore in the interest of the Austrian hereditary provinces and of the Czech crown lands that the Habsburgs gain control of Hungary, by force if necessary.

In July 1527, an army of German mercenaries invaded Hungary. The moment was well chosen, for the forces of King John I were tied up in the southern counties, where Slavonic peasants, incited by Ferdinand, had rebelled; the revolt was led by the 'Black Man', Jován Cserni. In one sweep, the invaders captured Buda. Szapolyai hurriedly redeployed his army, but on 27 September, near Tokaj, it suffered a bloody defeat.

King John fled across the Tisza and sought refuge in his home province of Transylvania. The support that he had hoped to find there did not materialize. Indeed, by early winter, what he had believed would be a secure stronghold turned against him. Georg Reicherstorffer, Ferdinand's clever and resourceful emissary, incited the people of Brassó, and then those of other Saxon towns to rise against the beleaguered monarch. Another agent, Gáspár Vingárti Horvát, manipulated the nobility in the same direction; under his encouragement, the voivode Péter Perényi, who was guardian of the crown, delivered that symbol of royal authority to Ferdinand, who managed to have himself crowned King of Hungary at Székesfehérvár on 3 November 1527.

Szapolyai's remaining followers in Transylvania put up a stubborn resistance; István Tomori held out until July 1528 in the fortress at Fogaras. To avoid being trapped in his mountainous {1-596.} province, King John prepared to cross the Királyhágó (Kings' Pass) and spend the winter in the Tisza region, but, before he did so, he took a decision that was to prove fateful for Hungary as well as for Transylvania.

The preceding year's setbacks convinced King John that, at the time of his coronation, he had miscalculated his rival's chances and intentions. His major mistake was to have believed that the German Empire's European war would keep Ferdinand from attacking Hungary. Had he been equally mistaken in believing that the Habsburgs could not protect Hungary from the Ottomans? The sight of the triumphant Germans led many Hungarians to opine — sincerely or out of calculation — that such help could be effective, but John I disagreed. From the end of 1526 onwards, the Ottomans had made repeated offers of 'friendship', but once Ferdinand had seized power, they renewed their attacks on Hungary's southern frontier. All this reinforced Szapolyai's conviction that the Ottomans would not peacefully assent to the installation of Habsburg power in Hungary. Experience told him that of the two, the Ottomans were the stronger power.

Thus King John dispatched an envoy from Kolozsvár, bearing an offer of alliance, to the sultan in Istanbul. The decision had been difficult, for Hungarian policy was traditionally hostile to the Ottomans, and it went against the Hungarians' Christian conscience. The decisive factor was probably the rebellion in Transylvania; in this increasingly hopeless situation, Szapolyai finally made his fateful choice. The envoy, the Polish nobleman Hieronym Łaski, soon accomplished his mission. On 29 February 1528, the sultan assented to an alliance with John I and gave written assurance of his support:

'To His Majesty, John, by the grace of God King of Hungary, Dalmatia, Croatia, and Moravia: I, Sultan Suleiman shah, invincible lord of the Ottomans, swear upon the almightiness, holiness, and glory of God on high [...] upon the strength of Heaven and the {1-597.} colour of the Earth, upon the Sun, the Moon, the Stars, upon the Earth and the holy and mighty Mohammed [...] upon my father, and my mother's milk, upon my bread and my sabre, my life and my soul, I swear to thee, my illustrious kinsman, that I shall never ignore your call for help, not even if I am dispossessed of my empire and realms [...] And even if I were abandoned by all, it would be my duty to find thee and say: here I am, ready to respond to all your wishes. Should I or my descendants fail to keep this promise, let the anger of Almighty God and his truth be called down on my head, and let me perish by it ... let the Earth not bear my steps but open up and swallow my body and soul forever'.[1]

By that time, Szapolyai had rallied his troops east of the Tisza for a counterattack directed at Kassa. On 8 March, in a battle near Szina (Abaúj county), he once again suffered defeat. Along with a small retinue, he found shelter in Poland, at Tarnów Castle.

However, John's assumption, that the Ottomans would intervene in Hungary, proved correct. In the autumn of 1528, Suleiman I had declared that he would drive the Habsburgs out of Hungary. Meanwhile, the Hungarian aristocrats and lesser nobles who had readily rallied to King Ferdinand grew disillusioned. The new government showed signs of bankruptcy and impotence; it failed to muster strength not only against the Ottomans, but even against John's scattered followers.

When Szapolyai learned of the sultan's preparations for war, he made another attempt to reconquer his homeland. The risk was well calculated, for by the end of 1528, after a series of minor battles, his forces controlled most of the Great Plain. The following year, Suleiman launched an offensive that took the Ottomans' horsetail standard as far as the gates of Vienna. There, his military successes came to an end, and when he drew his army out of Hungary, the forces of King Ferdinand I recaptured most of Transdanubia. Untouched by war, Upper Hungary remained under the control of Ferdinand's followers, but King John held on to the {1-598.} southern and eastern counties of Transdanubia to the Great Plain, and he soon prevailed in Transylvania as well.

The period that followed was marked by chaos and war. The Ottomans launched periodic attacks, including, in 1532, another unsuccessful attempt to take Vienna; the Habsburgs mounted minor counter-offensives, including a fruitless siege of Buda in late 1530. The opposing forces were well matched, and the front line that materialized in 1529 remained essentially stable. Three years after the battle of Mohács, and despite the desperate attempts of Hungarian politicians in both camps to reunite the country, Hungary remained divided into two parts.

The Ottomans benefited the most from this situation, for much of Hungary, formerly their most powerful enemy in Europe, had fallen into their sphere of influence. However, their success was qualified, for the Habsburgs had secured a foothold in western Hungary, there to build a seemingly impregnable line of defence. King Ferdinand's success was equally qualified: although Austria and Bohemia were secured by the strong defensive positions he had established in Hungary, the original goal, to impose his rule over all Hungary, remained a dream. Nor could King John claim victory. To be sure, he had made a comeback, but he had been compelled to ally himself with Hungary's traditional enemy, the Ottomans.

The biggest losers in the wars that followed the battle of Mohács were the principal defenders of the medieval Hungarian state, the ruling aristocracy; their country stood divided and ruled by foreign powers. Both kings' followers lamented this catastrophe and blamed the other side. King John had erred in assuming that the Habsburgs would not intervene; his opponents, for their part, had overestimated the scope and impact of the intervention. The two parties accepted the creation of separate state administrations in the divided country only as a temporary expedient; they retained the hope that the division could be ended by the 'conversion' or elimination of their opponents.

{1-599.} Royal authority suffered a precipitous decline, particularly in the east. In 1528, Szapolyai lost much of his family estate, and he failed to regain any of it. Only Buda, Solymos, and Lippa remained crown lands. The lesser nobility's support proved to be of little value in the war. State revenues plummeted, for the royal treasury no longer disposed of the taxes paid by the counties, including the mines, under Ferdinand's control, nor of the related customs duties.

John I made some efforts to resolve these problems. He tried to win over the inhabitants of large market towns on the Great Plain, people who had enriched themselves in the cattle and wine trade and were — despite their nominal villein status — regarded as cívises (peasant-citizens). Lippa was raised to the status of a free royal borough in 1528. In 1529, peasant-citizens were settled in Buda to take the place of expelled German burghers. The villeins' right to free movement, abrogated in 1514, was restored in 1530. In 1537, Hungarian peasant-burghers were settled in Kassa.

However, the royalist sympathies of the peasant-citizens and their material support was not sufficient to compensate for the attrition in the king's power. The rule of aristocratic landowners, which had caused many problems in the period before Mohács, was blatantly reimposed in King John's part of the country — by Bálint Török in Veszprém and Somogy counties, by Péter Perényi in Baranya and Zemplén counties, by Imre Czibak (until his death in 1534) in Bihar county, by István Werbőczy in Tolna and Nógrád counties, by the voivode Maylád (1534–40) in Fogaras, by Péter Petrovics in Temes county, and by the Kosztkas, Podmaniczkys, Bebeks and Ráskays in other parts of the country. They ruled in the king's name, but pursued their individual interests. There was no question of restricting their activities, for the more powerful a landlord, the more likely he was to defect to the other side in the event of some 'insult'. One of Ferdinand's Hungarian advisers reported bitterly: 'As long as the country remains divided, Your Majesty will not be able to exercise your royal prestige and power. Anyone who {1-600.} feels that his interests are at risk, or who is worried about incurring legal proceedings and punishment, will join the enemy. The countless malefactors will seek to escape punishment by changing sides. There will be a proliferation of illegal activity on both sides, giving rise to further disorder and wars'.[2]

Neither side could offer a remedy for the country's ills, and it is scarcely surprising that in such a political climate, personal unreliability and duplicity should be common. The spreading sense of hopelessness was well reflected in the ideological poverty of the two sides. The Habsburg camp professed the medieval belief in Christian unity, while Szapolyai's followers manifested the anti-German aspect of the nobility's patriotism. Both sides remained ineffectual. When, in 1529, King John hastened to Mohács to greet the sultan, his followers refused to accompany him, although at other times they would loudly proclaim their friendship for the Ottomans.

Another riddle is why King John failed to seize upon the Reformation, which at this time was emerging as an anti-Habsburg force in the German Empire. This cannot be fully accounted for by the personal convictions and enduring attachment to the Catholic faith and his closest associates (Imre Czibak, István Werbőczy, István Brodarics, Ferenc Frangepán, and, later, György Fráter). The spread of the Reformation in Hungary was not helped by the fact that it was mediated by the Germans, initially by the wife of Louis II, Mary Habsburg. Nor did it help that King John formed enduring links with Rome, which at times was overtly hostile to the Habsburgs. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, it would have been difficult for Hungary to break way from its traditional religious community at a time when its accommodation with the Ottomans inspired charges that it was betraying Christianity.
 

Kryvonis

Цензор
Transylvania in the Decade of Disintegration
http://mek.niif.hu/03400/03407/html/100.html
King John ruled over a state with uncertain borders, and one that was beset with chronic domestic problems. Transylvania was no better equipped to strengthen central authority than the other counties that remained under King John's rule.

Although the new king had once served as Transylvania's voivode, this scarcely enhanced the province's role in the new situation. In 1526–27, during the transitional period of consolidation, Transylvania's three 'nations' readily accepted the new ruler and his government. The Saxon towns and the Székelys may have made some tentative overtures to the Habsburgs, but this was of no immediate consequence. Although Szapolyai transferred a few of his underlings from the voivode's chancellery to Buda — the onetime treasurer, Miklós Kőrösy, became the king's secretary — he left most of them in their former posts. Perhaps he wanted these trusted followers to keep an eye on Péter Perényi, the influential aristocrat whom he had appointed as voivode (1526–29). The fact is that Szapolyai's reform of the Transylvanian chancellery — in terms of which the secretary performed administrative functions, and the prothonotary, juridical functions — was preserved unaltered. There is no evidence that King John ever gave preference to the province; his policy was that of the unified Hungarian ruling elite, and he aimed to serve the interests of the whole country.

The impact of the king's campaigns on Transylvania in 1527–28 has already been noted. The resurgence of war in late 1528 also had repercussions beyond Királyhágó. Ferdinand I's efforts to impose his rule were no more effective here than elsewhere in Hungary. The agents of his envoy, Reicherstorffer, instituted a reign of terror in the Saxon towns to squash any sign of disobedience. They even threatened the royal judge at Szeben, Markus Pemflinger, who was unflinchingly loyal to the Habsburgs. Péter Perényi, who retained the post of voivode, could get along with neither {1-602.} the Saxons nor the province's nobility. To make matters worse, Ferdinand intended to settle German mercenaries in the province, with the cost to be borne by the local population. The only significant military action by Transylvanians against the party of King John, in the fall of 1528 near Lippa, had no lasting consequence.

By that time, Szapolyai had returned from Tarnów and taken under his control the roads linking Buda to Transylvania. Acting on instructions from the Ottomans, the Moldavian ruler Petru Rareş launched attacks on the Székelyföld. In May 1529, the count of Temes, Bálint Török, arrived with his troops to lend a hand to the Habsburg supporters, but on 22 June, at Földvár (near Brassó), he was defeated by the Moldavians. In a series of minor battles, and through negotiation, John I's governor (and, in 1530–34, voivode), István Báthori of Somlyó, put an end to the resistance of Ferdinand's followers. The majority of Székelys changed sides and rallied to King John at the time of the battle at Földvár. The forces of Báthori and of his Transylvanian lieutenant, Gotthárd Kun, compelled the towns of Gyulafehérvár, Kolozsvár, and Beszterce to pledge allegiance to King John. Only the Saxons stood by King Ferdinand, and in late 1529, they held out against an offensive launched from the two Romanian principalities. However, in the summer of 1530, a Hungarian-Romanian-Turkish force laid siege and obtained the surrender of Brassó, and Segesvár surrendered the following January, leaving Nagyszeben as the last locus of Saxon resistance. The last Transylvanian magnate to support the Habsburgs, István Maylád, rallied to King John in early 1532, but the Saxons of Szeben continued to hold out; only on 1 March 1536 did they finally offer allegiance to King John. After 1529, Ferdinand could do little to assist his supporters in Transylvania. His one major initiative, in January 1536, was an offensive directed at Szatmár and led by Kristóf Kávásy, the castellan of Huszt, and Boldizsár Tallóci Bánffy; the campaign did precipitate the death of Gotthárd Kun, but it ended in utter defeat.

{1-603.} In these protracted battles, the various social forces in Transylvania essentially neutralized each other. The war against the Saxons was led mainly by Transylvanian-Hungarian nobles loyal to King John. The Székelys wavered in their allegiance; since 1519–21, Szapolyai had not enjoyed much popularity among them, and some Székelys remained ever ready to turn against the Hungarian king. Although Transylvania was the part of onetime Hungary most remote from Vienna, and although its borders were relatively easy to defend, its society was too divided to allow the province to become a power-base for King John. The domestic troubles that beset Transylvania had a feudal character, yet in the end they culminated in a generally pro-Szapolyai orientation. This process was similar to that in other areas of Hungary, where feudal lords vied for local power. The pattern was revealed most vividly in a series of events that occurred in 1534, and which at the time were considered to be highly significant.

When, in 1528–29, King John attempted to restore his rule in Hungary, he found himself burdened by many liabilities: dependence on the Ottomans, a divided country, the unreliability of the political elite, and personal guilt at having miscalculated the balance of forces. His actions only deepened the divisions. On 25 December 1530, at a hastily convened diet in Buda (the same meeting that restored the right of free migration), he appointed as governor a Venetian-Turkish financier named Alvise (Lodovico) Gritti. The latter, a confidant of Grand Vizier Ibrahim, was a major supplier of the Turkish armies and a veteran of Hungarian-Turkish negotiations. The choice was probably driven by a mixture of motives. The king wanted to share his heavy burden of responsibility and hoped that the Italian would facilitate negotiation with the Sublime Porte. He also counted on the wealthy Gritti to contribute to the royal treasury and to lease and revive the faltering mining industry.

{1-604.} In the event, Gritti's ambitions surpassed the king's expectations. He wanted to become the master of Hungary, initially by drawing on the sultan's support, and then by playing off Vienna against the Porte. In the spring of 1534, after a longer stay in Istanbul that left him politically weakened, Gritti headed back to Hungary with a Turkish army. When he entered Transylvania at Brassó, those of King John's supporters who had been preparing to oppose Gritti took fright, and some of them defected to Ferdinand, but Transylvania remained generally calm.

This mood of apprehensive calm was soon disturbed by the governor, and even more by his Hungarian followers, notably Orbán Batthyány and János Dóczy. At their instigation, Imre Czibak, Bishop of Várad and one of King John's most respected and popular followers, was murdered on 12 August 1534 near Brassó.

The nobility of Transylvania and Bihar county reacted in fury. Czibak's nephew, Ferenc Patócsy, called for a popular rising. At this moment, the post of voivode was vacant; Báthori had died, and his associate Hieronym Łaski, appointed in 1532, had been imprisoned on charges of being in Gritti's camp. The feudal orders chose King John's faithful soldier, Gotthárd Kun, as captain general, and after some hesitation, he led an army to confront Gritti. Soldiers from all parts of Transylvania (except Szeben, still in opposition) rallied to his army, which encircled the advancing forces of Gritti at Medgyes. Gritti sent a plea for help to the Voivode of Moldavia, Peter (who, following his intervention in 1529, had acquired Csicsó, Bálványos, and Beszterce); instead, Peter shifted allegiance and joined the Hungarians who were besieging Gritti's camp.

King John was now in a dilemma. If he disowned his governor, he would invite the wrath of the Ottomans; but if he lent assistance to Gritti, he would enrage his own supporters. Upon reflection, he decided that discretion was the better part of valour. Accompanied by a small force of cavalry, he waited in Várad until, {1-605.} on September 28, the Hungarians overwhelmed the defenders of Medgyes, putting the governor and most of his Turkish troops to the sword.

These events in Transylvania promised to influence Hungary's future, for everyone thought that after Gritti's demise, the sultan and the grand vizier would sever ties with their Hungarian partisans. King John, for his part, expected the worst, and he sent emissaries to Emperor Charles V with an offer to relinquish the throne. But the danger did not materialize. At first, the sultan was disposed to investigate the fate of his questionably loyal subordinate, Gritti; but once the Grand Vizier Ibrahim had fallen from favour and been executed (15 March 1536), the matter was dropped. The significant consequences of the Medgyes affair lay elsewhere. First, Imre Czibak's bishopric was assigned to the Pauline friar Utiešenović, otherwise known as György Martinuzzi, or, simply, Friar György (György Fráter), who was to become Szapolyai's chief adviser. Second, it had become clear that the Emperor was not prepared to help Hungary against the Ottomans even if King John himself requested it. The latter's offer of resignation has been conditional on the provision by the empire of adequate garrisons for the country's key fortresses; but Charles V, embroiled in recurrent wars with the French, understandably refused to take on this responsibility. Negotiations with the imperial court came to an inconclusive end in the summer of 1536.

If Transylvanians played a leading role in the events of 1534, this did not reflect the emergence of a sense of regional identity. There were few signs of such consciousness over the preceding hundred years, and even as the country was torn apart, it would be years before such particularistic sentiments materialized. The disintegration of medieval Hungary gathered speed and reached a critical point in 1538. Much as in 1534, Transylvania would play a prominent role without determining the course of events.
 

Kryvonis

Цензор
The Prelude to Transylvanian Statehood
http://mek.niif.hu/03400/03407/html/101.html
The events of 1536–37 confirmed that neither of the contending factions in Hungary could prevail. King John crowned his successes in Transylvania at the beginning of 1536 (in Szeben and Szatmár) by occupying Kassa at the end of the year. Ferdinand launched a two-pronged offensive in 1537, but the results were close to catastrophic for him. After initial successes in Upper Hungary, Leonhard Vels' troops were halted at Tokaj. Meanwhile, on the Drava, an army of close to 40,000, led by Hans Katzianer, fought the biggest battle in Hungary since Mohács (and until that of Mezőkeresztes, in 1596); the victor was a comparatively small Turkish force under the bey of Bosnia and Szendrő.

After eleven years of promises, threats, and warfare, the Habsburg King's resolve began to flag. King John, for his part, had been toying for years with the option of a pact acknowledging the division of the country. The emperor sent delegates to the negotiations, which began at the end of 1537. At most of the meetings, Szapolyai was represented by György Fráter, who gave his sovereign the loyalty and support that John had vainly expected from Gritti. The Pauline friar was not only bishop of Várad but also the king's treasurer, and he soon put the royal finances in order. By taking responsibility for the necessary fiscal measures, as well as for the controversial negotiations on the country's division, he lightened the king's burden of unpopularity.

The peace treaty was signed on 24 February 1538, at Nagyvárad, by representatives of John I, Ferdinand I, and Charles V. According to its terms, the two monarchs recognized each other's sovereignty over the part of Hungary that they already controlled. Moreover, John agreed that, after his death, his realm would revert to the House of Habsburg, with the proviso that if he fathered an heir, Ferdinand would grant the latter a principality in the Szepesség and its vicinity.

{1-607.} Both parties considered that the merit of this treaty lay in the promise that the country would eventually be reunified. A few doubted John's sincerity, and questioned the value of an agreement in which one side surrendered a part of the country he did not control, while the other offered in return a non-existent principality.

Within a few months, the sceptics were vindicated. Suspecting that the sultan would disapprove, the contracting parties kept the treaty secret and counted on Charles V to rescue Hungary in case of need. However, the emperor, who had just concluded a peace — which proved to be short-lived — with the French, was disposed to confront the Ottomans only in the Mediterranean. When, in the autumn of 1538, the sultan launched an offensive in Europe, everyone believed that his target was Hungary. John called upon his new allies for help, but all that they provided, after some delay, was a few thousand mercenaries. Although the king's fears turned out to be premature — Suleiman was satisfied to expel Petru Rareş and extend suzerainty over Wallachia and Moldavia — he was forced to draw the appropriate conclusions. Whatever his expectations at Nagyvárad, John now adopted a policy that clearly contravened the treaty.

György Fráter boldly pursued his difficult task. In early 1539, Ferdinand demanded that the Nagyvárad compromise be made public. The bishop-treasurer categorically rejected the request. Moreover, although the treaty required that those privy to it swear to abide by the terms, the friar prevented John's followers from complying, provoking the ire of many aristocrats and of those lesser noblemen who were well-informed. The ever-optimistic chancellor, Werbőczy, firmly believed that the peace treaty would reunify his country; he protested in the royal council and sought contacts with the Viennese court.

John's supporters and opponents debated the merits of György Fráter's manoeuvres, but the king reproved the dissenters and proceeded to take a step that would have far-reaching consequences. {1-608.} He had been seeking a wife, and his choice fell on Isabella, the younger daughter of his former brother-in-law, the elderly Polish king Sigismund I.

Had he taken the Nagyvárad Treaty seriously, John would have seen that it was in his interest to stay unmarried. However, the ensuing events gave him reason to regard the agreement as little more than a provisional cease-fire, which he could exploit to gain time and rebuild his forces. He probably also believed — again, with some justification — that his realm needed the preservation of his Turcophile rule. Being over fifty years of age, he calculated that he should produce a son and heir, in whose name the treaty could be challenged.

The royal wedding was celebrated on 2 March 1539, at Székesfehérvár. Isabella, who was barely twenty, soon became pregnant. More and more people came to realize that the king and the bishop-treasurer were preparing to break the treaty.

At this point, Transylvania once again came to play a role in Hungary's affairs. Under the influence of the war-scare of 1538, local aristocrats began secretly to organize. Their activity was directed by the voivode István Maylád, who had been appointed in 1534; his deputy, Imre Balassa, took over the post in 1536 but remained more aloof. Little is known about the aims of the 'conspirators', but one thing is clear: they wanted to detach Transylvania from Hungary, and thus shelter the province from the growing risk of a Turkish offensive. Maylád, who allegedly was of Romanian extraction, was the first Transylvanian-born, aristocratic landowner since many years to hold the post of voivode. The initiative drew a positive response from the province's nobility, including prominent aristocrats such as Ferenc Kendi, King John's treasurer. Part of the province's ruling elite reached for autonomous power to defend their vested interests.

In pursuit of their goal, Maylád and his associates sought contact with both the Ottomans and the Germans. There are indications {1-609.} that they even held talks with the feudal lords of the Austrian and Bohemian provinces. Their efforts produced dismal results. The Ottomans would not deign to speak to them. Ferdinand was prepared to offer his support only if they became his agents. As for Szapolyai, when he got wind of the initiatives, he moved quickly to take forceful reprisals.

The centuries-old tradition of Hungary's ruling elite to draw together was difficult to challenge. Nor was it easy to foresee how an autonomous Transylvania would fare in the political chaos that prevailed in the Danubian region. In such circumstances, it is scarcely surprising that this uncertain enterprise collapsed as soon as King John's forces appeared on the scene. Most of the plotters begged for mercy and were pardoned, leaving Maylád to retrench himself in Fogaras. At the end of May, Bálint Török and András Báthori laid siege to Fogaras, but they lacked the time to complete the task.

John I was already ailing when he entered Transylvania, and his health continued to deteriorate. He lived long enough to receive the happy news on 10 July, at his encampment in Szászváros: Isabella had given birth to a healthy son three days earlier at Buda. The delighted king rode out among his troops, but he suffered a malaise that evening, and, after nearly two weeks of agony, expired.

György Fráter was left with the formidable challenge of forestalling, in the name of an infant crown-prince, the disintegration of Szapolyai's realm. He set to the task with his accustomed energy, rushing to Buda to have a hastily-convened diet elect Szapolyai's son, John Sigismund, king. The bishop could scarcely prevent aristocrats who insisted on respect for the Treaty of Nagyvárad from shifting their allegiance; they included, in Hungary, Ferenc Frangepán and Péter Perényi, and, in Transylvania, István Maylád and Imre Balassa. However, the Fráter — assisted by his fellow royal guardians, Bálint Török and Péter Petrovics — managed to stave off disaster by repelling an attack on Buda led by Ferdinand's {1-610.} trustworthy old general, Leonhard Vels. Central Hungary thus remained under the control of the bishop; he dispatched the chancellor, Werbőczy, to Istanbul with the request that the sultan afford recognition and succour to the infant king.

Suleiman did not hesitate to reassure his anxious supporters, and in October 1540, the elderly chancellor reported: 'I can inform your lordships that after we had refuted our opponents' arguments, and thanks to the Good Lord's help, the almighty sultan responded according to our desires to all our proposals.'[3]

However, matters soon took a very different turn at the Sublime Porte, for no sooner had Werbőczy departed than Ferdinand I's envoy, Hieronym Łaski, arrived in Istanbul. In order to win the sultan's acquiescence to Habsburg rule in Hungary, he gave a detailed account of the Nagyvárad negotiations. The Habsburgs' diplomatic efforts were probably based on the double premise that the Hungarian ruling elite resented the country's division and that those who opposed Vienna could persist only because they enjoyed the support of the Ottomans. Therefore, if the sultan could be manoeuvred into breaking with his onetime supporters, Szapolyai's followers would have no choice but to offer their allegiance to Ferdinand. It was in the interest of the Austrian and Bohemian provinces that their dangerous neighbour, Turcophile Hungary, should cease to exist. The flaw in this stratagem was the assumption that the 'Hungarian problem' could be solved without the involvement of Turkish power, and without inviting Turkish retaliation.

In fact, the sultan became incensed not so much by the story of past betrayals as by the evident unreliability of his Hungarian allies. He had no intention of putting at risk the results of fifteen years of expansion, notably his gains in Hungary. Łaski was put under arrest, and when he was released a year later, he was terminally ill; meanwhile, the Ottomans made preparations for a new Danubian offensive.

{1-611.} In May 1541, Ferdinand's troops once again laid siege to Buda. By the time the Ottomans' advance guard drew near, General Roggendorff and Péter Perényi were already considering the option of withdrawal, for György Fráter and his companions had been defending the capital with steadfast heroism. They drowned in blood a conspiracy organized by burghers in Buda and supported by Queen Isabella, who was totally befuddled by the political chaos and only wished to escape.

At the end of July, the attacking army was decimated in a series of ill-advised rearguard actions, and the siege collapsed. By the time Suleiman arrived, the enemy had departed from Buda. The size of the Turkish relief force made György Fráter, Bálint Török, and Péter Petrovics apprehensive, but they could scarcely afford to offend the sultan, for Buda could not have withstood another siege. On 29 August, the fifteenth anniversary of the defeat at Mohács, the Hungarian leaders left for the sultan's camp to pay their respects; in their absence, Turkish janissaries arrived to do some 'sightseeing' and occupied Buda. The sultan had Bálint Török put in chains and advised György Fráter that in exchange for an annual tribute of 10,000 forints, he would allow King John's son to rule over Transylvania and the region east of the Tisza.

This painful turn in Hungary's history was one step on the way to the creation of a Transylvanian state. Buda having become the seat of a sanjak, Fráter escorted Isabella and the young John Sigismund to Lippa. Memories of this sad affair would haunt the Hungarian protagonists, and György Fráter was frequently overcome by remorse, but there was no time for lamentation.

The year 1541 brought new and ominous signs of the Ottomans' expansionism, and also of the Habsburgs' weakness and inability to engage in effective military action in Hungary. Thus the political vice that had gripped Hungary since 1529–32 stayed. The loss of Buda was distressing, although the Ottomans proposed that the earlier 'alliance' be renewed — on only slightly stricter terms — {1-612.} with respect to what remained of Szapolyai's realm. The more realistic Hungarians could draw some comfort from the fact that the autonomous remnant of their country was no longer caught between the Turkish and Habsburg spheres of interest.

On the way to Lippa, György Fráter had to endure the reproaches of a despairing Isabella and of Hungarian aristocrats, but he was already drawing up plans for the most urgent measures. His first priority was to secure the regions assigned to him by the Ottomans. He exercised authority over the region east of the Tisza, particularly over its central part, Bihar county, and over Szapolyai's Lippa-Solymos domain in the southern district. In Transylvania, the Ottomans themselves took measures to debilitate the opposition. Moldavian and Turkish forces drove István Maylád back to Fogaras castle, then, on 20 July — before the fall of Buda — they ensnared him into a trap. The restless aristocrat joined Bálint Török in lifelong captivity. Transylvania's 'three nations' had no choice but to accommodate themselves to the new circumstances. On 18 October 1541, Fráter convened a diet in Debrecen, the first conference to draw together the feudal leaders of the future Transylvanian Principality — representing the counties, the Székelys, and the Saxons — and the nobles of the region east of the Tisza. Predictably, the diet proclaimed its loyalty to the House of Szapolyai.

The harmony proved to be short-lived, for the participants were separated by geography, traditions, and the earlier administrative divisions, and they were not keen to meet again. Still, the diet provided a legal basis for Fráter's government. A Transylvanian national assembly, held on 20 January 1542 at Marosvásárhely, acknowledged him as the province's governor (helytartó). A second assembly, convened in late March at Torda, invited Queen Isabella and her son to establish residence in the province; it further decided to assign to the queen and the governor twenty-two councillors, representing the three nations.

{1-613.} György Fráter realized that, in the circumstances, Transylvania was best suited to serve as the political centre of the reduced realm. Giovanni Statileo, bishop of Transylvania and one of King John's leading diplomats, had died recently. That summer, Fráter and Isabella moved into the episcopal palace at Gyulafehérvár, and the governor took over the vast episcopal estates (including Gyulafehérvár, Diód, Almás, and Gyalu). They did not appoint a new Transylvanian bishop.

These state-building efforts did not proceed undisturbed. The loss of Buda caused great fright among the Austrian and Bohemian feudal estates, and this helped Ferdinand I to muster forces for a counter-attack. Since the German empire also offered assistance, expectations were rife that the offensive, planned for summer 1542, would expel the Ottomans. The scale of the preparations induced Fráter to caution. Not wanting to be on the wrong side in case the Habsburgs prevailed, he sought once again to parley with Ferdinand. On 29 December 1541, negotiators at Gyalu castle reached a tentative agreement that evoked the Nagyvárad Treaty: Hungary would be united under the Habsburgs' rule, and, in compensation, the Szapolyai family would receive Szepes castle and its dependencies.

The bishop-treasurer's caution proved to be well-founded. Although Ferdinand managed to throw into battle more than 50,000 men, the campaign of 1542 ended in disaster. After a few days of fighting around Pest, the Christian army effected a withdrawal, then virtually disintegrated.

The troubles did not end there. In July 1542, before Ferdinand's ill-fated campaign, Francis I, King of France, had once again declared war on Charles V, drawing away the empire's military forces. In 1543, the sultan sent his garrison in Hungary on the offensive, and even this modest threat was more than the isolated Ferdinand could handle; by the end of the year, Valpó, Siklós, Pécs, Esztergom, Tata, and Székesfehérvár had fallen to the Ottomans. In {1-614.} 1544, the Ottomans captured Visegrád, Nógrád, and Hatvan, creating a defensive ring around Buda.

At the end of 1544, Charles V secured yet another provisional truce with the French, but Ferdinand I decided to abandon his obviously hopeless quest. On 10 November 1545, at Adrianople, his envoys negotiated a cease-fire, leaving Hungary to her fate.

In these circumstances, the Szapolyai monarchy could hardly uphold the terms of the Gyalu agreement. The sultan took pains to impress on the Gyulafehérvár court which side was the stronger. In late 1542, Petru Rareş, who had regained his Moldavian throne, acted on Istanbul's instructions and raided Transylvania. Fráter managed to stop the Moldavians, but the defeat of the Habsburg army at Pest confirmed the validity of his reservations about the agreement, which in the meantime had been made public.

On 20 December 1542, the Transylvanian diet reconvened at Torda and passed several resolutions. It confirmed the union of the 'three nations'; overrode the Saxons' protests and abrogated the Gyalu agreement; acknowledged John Sigismund ('John II, Hungary's elected king') as the province's sovereign; advised Ferdinand I that if he was unable to protect them, he should at least let them take care of themselves; and, finally, agreed to pay the tribute demanded by the Ottomans. In early 1543, 10,000 forints, the first tribute ever paid by Transylvania, were delivered to the Sublime Porte. The battles that took place in 1543–44 confirmed the wisdom of Fráter's decision to persist in defending the interests of the House of Szapolyai.

The clarification of Hungary's foreign relations went hand in hand with the domestic consolidation of the new leadership. Beginning with the acquisition of the Gyulafehérvár episcopal estates, the number of fiscal domains in Transylvania grew steadily. Fráter retrieved Déva and Görgény from the onetime captain-general, Boldizsár Bornemissza; in reward for his services, the latter received Küküllő castle, recently the property of Petru Rareş. {1-615.} The Maylád family was momentarily allowed to retain Fogaras, but Katalin Nádasdy, the wife of István Maylád (captive in Istanbul) was obliged to submit in all matters to the authority of Isabella and the governor.

The central authority's power was enhanced by the Kővár estates, in north-eastern Transylvania and by a fortress, erected by György Fráter, close by in the Szamos valley. Only a few Transylvanian estates' domains remained in the hands of local aristocrats. János Török of Enying acquired Vajdahunyad, and the ambitious Kendi family took over Marosvécs. To forestall further incursions, Csicsó was returned to Petru Rareş, but only after the castle had been torn down.

The extension of state authority over the region east of the Tisza took longer, and brought different results. At this time, the eastern Hungarian Kingdom encompassed the counties of Máramaros, Szabolcs, Szatmár, Közép-Szolnok, Bihar, Outer-Szolnok, Békés, Csongrád, Arad, and Csanád, as well as the Temesköz. Várad and Lippa were important centres of state power, guaranteing predominance over the region's magnates. For all practical purposes, Péter Petrovics was the absolute ruler of the Temesköz, but shared political goals and his loyalty to the Szapolyai family led him to cooperate with György Fráter. There were other districts ruled as private fiefs: the area from Máramaros to Kraszna by the Drágffy-Perényi family and the Báthoris of Ecsed and Somlyó; Békés by the Patócsy; the Maros valley by the Jaksics family; and Debrecen by the Török family of Enying. In the undefined border zones of Zemplén, Borsod, and Abaúj counties, the Balassa, Losonci, Bebek families, and the Drugeths of Homonna ruled with considerable autonomy.

In these circumstances, it is scarcely surprising that the region would come to challenge Fráter's authority, particularly amidst the uncertainties of 1542. In a region where the authority and traditions of the Hungarian state had only a slight impact, the local lords felt {1-616.} freer to make overtures to the Habsburgs. Habsburg defeat at Pest dampened their enthusiasm; at the Derecske diet, convened in late 1542, they acceded to György Fráter's request that they share the burden of paying tribute to the Ottomans. The military campaigns of 1543–44 left only one secure road link to Habsburg Hungary, along the Vág valley, and this further reduced the ranks of Habsburg supporters. As a result, only András Báthori of Ecsed and Kristóf Hagymásy, the castellan of Huszt, managed to preserve a certain independence. In August 1544, delegates from counties along the Tisza and in the region east of the Tisza participated as equals in the Transylvanian diet at Torda. With the entrenchment of this practice, the Transylvanian diet became the legal successor of the Hungarian diets.

Over time, property relations changed to the benefit of the friar-governor. In the queen's name, he summarily appropriated Nagylak (the seat of the Jaksics family), Csanád (the episcopal see), and the Várday family's main estate, at Kisvárda. When Gáspár Drágffy died, the family's vast estates reverted to his only son, a minor; in his capacity as the boy's guardian, Fráter laid hands on Tasnád, Erdőd, and Valkó, all important assets.

The diet of Eastern Hungary reconvened on 24 April 1545 at Torda. News of the Habsburg-Ottoman peace talks had just reached Transylvania, and György Fráter considered the moment opportune to consolidate the political system. At his request, the diet abrogated the rights that had been left — at least nominally — to Ferdinand: the power to grant property and ultimate judicial authority. It recognized John Sigismund as King John II of Hungary and prohibited his subjects from pursuing contacts with foreign powers, including Pozsony (Bratislava) and Vienna.

Fráter did suffer one setback: the diet refused to name him governor. To encourage the feudal estates in this step, Queen Isabella had evoked the precedent of Gritti. This minor clash between the queen and the mighty regent owed partly to the deterioration {1-617.} in their relations during 1540–41, but it also reflected the imbalance inherent in the political system.

As a regent and royal treasurer, Fráter exercised total control over the state's finances and crown properties. To serve these ends, a new administrative structure had to be created. Until 1541, Transylvania had been administered by the central organs of the Hungarian Kingdom, but the chancellery and high court had vanished in the political chaos of 1540–41: the expert clerks, jurists, and notaries were scattered, most of them ending up in the service of Ferdinand. As for the local apparatus of Transylvania's voivode, it was wholly inadequate to the task of administering a state. Thus György Fráter had no choice but to form a new administrative structure staffed by people, trained in law, drawn from Transylvania and other places. This single, all-purpose chancellery played no role in policy-making; only the judicial administrators enjoyed a certain — highly restricted — latitude in their sphere. There was no question of appointing a chancellor: the regent exercised direct control over his administrators, isolating the latter from Isabella's influence. As noted, in early 1542, the Transylvanians took an initiative in favour of elected councillors, but György Fráter blocked all such attempts. The provision for elected councils was never put into practice.

The feudal estates lost much of their influence over the affairs of state. Unwilling to alter their pro-Habsburg sympathies, the Saxons adopted a passive stance. Péter Haller, the royal magistrate at Szeben, was just about the only Saxon with direct access to the court at Gyulafehérvár, where he continued to be regarded as a member of the opposition. The Székelys could occasionally defend their interests at meetings of the diet, but they had few advocates, if any, in the circles around the regent and the queen. This was all the more striking since the late King John's 'familiars' — mostly men of modest means who had no roots within the new confines of the country — and their relatives were found in great numbers {1-618.} amongst the senior officials and courtiers; they included Ferenc Kőrösy, Benedek Bajoni, Gábor Pesti, István Maticsnai, Antal Verancsics, János Glésán, and Orbán Batthyány.

The major landowning aristocrats continued to enjoy the highest degree of prestige. Only a few of them — Ferenc Kendi, Farkas Bethlen, László Mikola — were authentic Transylvanians; the most influential were Péter Petrovics, Ferenc Patócsy, Imre Balassa, Antal Losonci, Antal Homonnai, and János Török. These aristocrats not only shared in the governance of Szapolyai's realm but also continued to nurture intimate relations with their social equals — many of them close relatives — living in the 'other' Hungary. Most of Hungary's ruling class harboured the hope of reuniting the country, and György Fráter constantly felt the pressure of this wish and expectation.

As long as the friar-regent and the queen pursued identical political objectives, their latent differences and the discontent within the ruling class could be held in check. To be sure, relations were often strained between the royal widow and György Fráter. The Jagiello princess, brought up in the very different world of the royal court at Cracow, had difficulty adapting herself to the violent nature of Hungarian politics, to the regent's notoriously cold manner, and, above all, to the necessary economies. Their discord mostly took the form of a covert contest for power. György Fráter made forceful efforts — ostensibly in the name of the House of Szapolyai — to consolidate central authority. His advantage lay in the power of initiative, in his political experience, and in the economic resources at his command. Isabella, however, had law and traditional royal prerogative on her side, and she had no intention of surrendering her right to rule.

In the early years of this state, the queen, affected perhaps by inexperience or a sense of injury, would attempt to constrain the regent's growing power by demanding implementation of the Gyalu Treaty. The most determined champions of the House of {1-619.} Szapolyai, including Péter Petrovics, Ferenc Kendi, and Ferenc Patócsy, were naturally disposed to challenge the power of the friar, whom they despised and envied; but in the wake of the Turkish victories in 1543–44, they — and other potential dissenters — could not take the risk of showing their true colours. Thus the Gyalu issue disappeared from the agenda, and Isabella had to battle against György Fráter within the constraints of the existing political structure. In the event, the young woman — moody, impulsive, and a novice in politics — proved to be no match for the adamant and determined friar.
 

Kryvonis

Цензор
Downfall and Renewal
http://mek.niif.hu/03400/03407/html/102.html
Hungary's governance was marked by a precarious and delicate balance of power, one vulnerable to the first major disturbance. The discord that appeared to have been suppressed by the military campaigns of 1543–44 flared up again at the end of the decade as a consequence of political developments outside Hungary. There appeared, at the apex of power, an advocate of a break with the Szapolyai policy. This time, the challenge came not from Isabella, but from the friar himself, who seemingly decided to acknowledge Habsburg rule.

This stunning reversal had its roots in early 1546, when the Sublime Porte, freed of the demands of a Danubian war, adopted a firmer stance regarding the Szapolyai kingdom. In order to secure communications between Titel and Szeged, the Ottomans demanded that the fortresses of Becse and Becskerek be handed over to them. Predictably, their request caused an uproar in Gyulafehérvár. György Fráter lost no time in asking the sultan to reconsider the demand; meanwhile, on the home front, he devoted his energies to countering the attempts of Isabella to exploit the crisis.

The feudal estates in Transylvania and the region east of the Tisza also tried to draw advantage from the Becse affair. In autumn {1-620.} 1546, at the diet in Kolozsvár, a resolution was passed demanding that the regent give a public accounting of the state's finances. György Fráter convened a 'counter-diet' at Szászsebes, then, after protracted wrangling, reached an accommodation with Isabella; his major concession was a promise to let the queen participate in the affairs of state.

The year 1547 brought three significant changes in European politics. The Habsburgs' arch-enemy, Francis I, died the last day of March. On April 24, Charles V's army won a decisive victory near Mühlberg over forces of the rebellious Protestant princes (the Schmalkalden League). Finally, on June 19, a peace treaty was concluded between the Holy Roman Emperor and the Sultan of the Ottomans.

A good twenty years had passed since King John first decided to ally himself with the Ottomans. This policy had obviously produced some positive results. Left largely to its own devices, Eastern Hungary was preserved from Turkish attack, and this without having to submit to the sultan's suzerainty. Moreover, the country's peace was not seriously disturbed by the expansionary efforts of the Habsburgs.

However, these results owed much to Ferdinand I, whose resistance, however passive, constrained the Ottomans' freedom of action. In the event that this confrontation should dissipate, Transylvania would face the prospect and necessity of submitting to the Ottomans. The loss of Buda and the Becse affair indicated that the Ottomans were still bent on conquest, and that they had their eyes on the Szapolyais' part of Hungary. The threat was more than hypothetical: in 1547, Suleiman reiterated his request for the castles in the Temesköz and refused to extend the peace treaty with the Habsburgs to cover the Eastern Hungarian Kingdom. To be sure, he wrote to Isabella assuring her of his continuing good will, but the message was full of qualifications.

{1-621.} It is not surprising, then, that Isabella's advisers, headed by György Fráter, addressed a desperate appeal to Charles V — much like the feudal estates of Habsburg Hungary had done earlier — not to endorse the treaty, warning him that the peace would precipitate Hungary's utter destruction: 'For no peace is possible with an enemy that is bent not only on conquering us, but also on killing us; an enemy that is no longer satisfied with our tribute but is raising demands for more and more of our fortresses and is searching for opportunities to wear us down... At a time when the need is urgent and his military preparedness high, the emperor should not allow to let the opportunity pass, but attempt to liberate Hungary... Besides, [Transylvania] is ringed by virtually impassable mountains, and it can be defended by relatively small forces stationed in the passes. However, once lost, Transylvania would be very difficult to reconquer... Since our honour and loyalty bind us to the queen and her innocent son, we beg that you take steps to assure their welfare in accordance with the treaties'.[4]

Agreements may be signed simply to deceive or to gain time, as occurred in 1538 and 1541. To request continuation of the war, and to make a scarcely-veiled offer to comply with the Gyalu Treaty, incurred graver responsibilities. However, there was no other means available to persuade the Habsburgs to persist in the war against the Ottomans. To those living in the Carpathian Basin, it seemed that the German Empire, freed of its most dangerous internal and external enemies, was in an unprecedentedly favourable situation. The Ottomans, for their part, took advantage of the European peace to launch a new Persian offensive in early 1548.

The Hungarian overture fell on deaf ears in Vienna as well as at the German court. Charles V had little confidence that the empire's internal problems had been resolved by his victory at Mühlberg, and he thus clung to the peace agreement reached with the Sublime Porte. In Hungary, the war of nerves dragged on. For {1-622.} the most part, the feudal estates blamed the friar, and his supposed blind hunger for power, for the enduring division of the country. Queen Isabella, for her part, asserted her independence in the spring 1548 by initiating talks with Ferdinand I about the possibility of her departure.

György Fráter decided that the time had come to break Hungarian policy out of its vicious circle. He proposed to nudge the Habsburgs out of their sterile inaction and drive Isabella into making a choice that would definitively settle the fate of the House of Szapolyai. He took advantage of the queen's spring initiative to start his own negotiations with Vienna, offering once again to implement the Gyalu Treaty.

Ferdinand was faced with a difficult choice. Although he realized that Charles V had cause to remain passive, he was unwilling to surrender what was perhaps his most ardently pursued goal: sovereignty over all of Hungary. His aim may have been similar to that of the regent in Transylvania, to force his emperor brother to become involved in the struggle for Hungary. He may even have entertained the illusion that if he won the support of all Hungarians, he would become strong enough to deal with the Ottomans. Alternatively, he may have only wanted to eliminate the Szapolyai state, which only promoted dissension among Hungarians and hostility toward him, and cared little about the consequences for Transylvania and the Tisza region if the Ottomans considered the Hungarian initiative to be a casus belli.

György Fráter intended the proposed accord to preserve his state from the Ottomans. In the event, it took more than a year for Ferdinand to make up his mind and agree to commit troops to the defence of his future province. The new agreement, ratified in September 1549 at Nyírbátor, also provided compensation — the Silesian principalities of Oppeln and Ratibor — for Isabella and 'King John's son'. The negotiators agreed that the treaty should be kept secret and that the friar would continue to govern Transylvania, now in the name of King Ferdinand I.

{1-623.} Isabella was not privy to the negotiations leading up to the Nyírbátor agreement. During those fateful days, she sojourned at Déva castle, planning a marriage that would presumably facilitate her departure from Hungary. When she learned of the agreement — concluded without her knowledge, and against her interests — the queen abandoned all pretence: she rejected the terms and set about rallying her supporters. Her earlier threats to leave the country had been purely tactical, with the aim of weakening the friar's authority. Committed to preserving the dynasty's power, Isabella went so far as to denounce György Fráter to the sultan as a 'traitor'.

The Porte had already got wind of the agreement from Vienna, and it now dispatched an agent to Gyulafehérvár, with instructions to seize or execute the regent. Supporters of the Szapolyai cause now felt free to challenge the friar, and took up arms. Péter Petrovics led troops from Temes province into the Maros valley, and the Székelys turned rebellious. Meanwhile, some feudal lords, led by Ferenc Kendi and Farkas Bethlen, adopted a wait-and-see attitude. By September 1550, the friar was in dire straits, but thanks to his extraordinary energy, he once again rose to the challenge. He launched a counter-attack, laying siege to the fortress at Gyulafehérvár, where Isabella was sheltered. After six weeks, the queen gave up the struggle and dispatched envoys to tell the friar that she would receive him back in her 'good graces'. Her willingness to compromise was opportune, and probably not purely coincidental, for the Szapolyai realm had come under attack from three directions simultaneously: by Kasim, the Pasha of Buda, at Lippa, by Moldavian forces at Bereck, and by Wallachia's voivode at the Vöröstorony Pass. On October 29, the friar convened an armed diet at Torda and, exploiting the general alarm, managed to rally his supporters. In early November, the military balance shifted in his favour. Péter Petrovics' fortresses in the Temesköz were overrun by the captain of Várad, Tamás Varkocs; the Moldavian voivode Ilie was driven back beyond the Carpathians by forces under the friar's {1-624.} command; the Wallachians were routed by János Kendi; and the lord lieutenant of Hunyad county, János Török, repulsed the forces of Kasim Pasha.

The danger was thus overcome, and the queen gave in. On November 30, at Gyulafehérvár, a tearful Isabella made peace with György Fráter and endorsed the Nyírbátor agreement. By then, the friar had no doubt that the queen's presence constituted a double burden for him. A personal threat, for whenever he departed from the late King John's political line, the power-hungry woman would emerge as the natural leader of Szapolyai loyalists; and a threat to the country, for — at least in the friar's opinion — her policy shifts were always inopportune and ill-inspired. Now, in 1550, it had become clear that even though Isabella was no match for him, she would not shrink from inciting her followers to defy the regent.

The friar was therefore determined to put into effect the Nyírbátor agreement. However, he was not aware that while he was forcefully quelling the opposition of the queen and their subjects in order to pave the way for cooperation with the Habsburgs, in Vienna, the Hungarian question once again lost its urgency. In 1550, at an imperial council in Augsburg, Ferdinand had his first major quarrel with Charles V. He could no longer count on his brother's aid in pursuit of his ambitions in Transylvania — an ominous turn, considering that the Ottomans had just terminated their Persian campaign. The Habsburg king momentarily lost his self-assurance and proposed to György Fráter that they postpone implementation of the agreement. However, the friar was past the point of no return. Isabella, for her part, made sure that he would be compelled to make his choice. The tears she had shed at Gyulafehérvár soon dried, and she once again protested to the sultan at the friar's 'treason', requesting that her son be named 'King of Transylvania'. The initiative was backed by her most faithful ally, Péter Petrovics, by other supporters, notably the aristocrats Ferenc Patócsy, from Békés county, and Menyhárt Balassa from Upper Hungary. {1-625.} Petrovics even offered Becse and Becskerek to the Ottomans in return for overthrowing the regent. In May 1551, rebellion broke out once again in Transylvania, and once again György Fráter laid siege to Gyulafehérvár.

The Hungarian aristocrats who engaged in humiliating talks with the sultan did so for reasons that are obvious. If György Fráter and the majority of Transylvania's elite realized their goal of adhering to the Habsburgs' realm, the first to suffer the Ottomans' predictable riposte would be the border regions: the Temesköz, which was Petrovics's domain, and the southern part of the region east of the Tisza, which encompassed the Patócsy family's estates. It is scarcely surprising that they were the ones least reassured by the Habsburgs' promise of assistance.

Ferdinand I did not wish to appear weak when, after twenty-five years, the opportune moment finally arrived. In the summer of 1551, he launched a Transylvanian campaign. The army, led by an Italian mercenary officer, Giovanni Battista Castaldo, Lord Chief Justice [országbíró] Tamás Nádasdy, and István Losonci, consisted of no more than six to seven thousand men — 'too little for an army, too much for a diplomatic mission,' remarked a bitter observer.[5] In the event, Castaldo's mercenaries did not need to fight a battle. When, at the beginning of June, Menyhárt Balassa and Péter Petrovics sped to rescue the besieged Isabella, they were defeated by György Fráter, and on June 7, Gyulafehérvár surrendered. On 19 June, at Szászsebes castle, a despairing Isabella signed on behalf of the child-king John II the letter of abdication thrust upon her by the friar. Castaldo marched into Gyulafehérvár, and András Báthori soon took over the governance of Temes province. On 26 July, the diet at Kolozsvár acknowledged the queen's abdication and the restoration of King Ferdinand's rule. On August 8, Isabella left Transylvania, travelling first to Kassa, then to Silesia. Péter Petrovics was granted Munkács castle in exchange for Temesvár.

It was a promising start, but storm clouds were already gathering in the southeast. Ferdinand's ambassador in Istanbul, {1-626.} Malvezzi, reported on 18 July 1551 that the sultan had reacted to the military movements in Transylvania by instructing Mehmed Sokollu, the bey of Rumelia, to launch an offensive, and that he, the ambassador, was being held captive. Pasha Mehmed had reached Szalánkemén with his troops when, on August 3, he learned that the sultan's treasury had received from György Fráter the tribute of 10,000 forints, which had been paid annually ever since 1543. Mehmed sent off a letter requesting that the friar clarify his intentions, and, while awaiting an answer, proceeded to occupy Becse, Becskerek, Csanád, and Lippa; thanks to the heroism of Temesvár's new captain, István Losonci, the bey failed capture that stronghold. These successes, together with an abundance of gifts, mollified the Turkish leader to the point that he lent credence to György Fráter's apology: the real traitor had been Petrovics, for it was his fortresses which were now guarded by Ferdinand's troops! The military operation was terminated, according to Turkish custom, on Kasim's Day, at the end of October, but the bey's departure gave only temporary respite to György Fráter.

To be sure, the hopes of Transylvania's regent had been fulfilled in two important respects: first, he had got the Habsburgs to violate their peace treaty with the Ottomans, and, second, he had got rid of Queen Isabella. On the other hand, the Ottomans had sprung into action and occupied a large chunk of Transylvania's southeastern defence line. This understandably unsettled the feudal estates. Moreover, although reinforcements had arrived, led by the general Sforza Pallavicini, the assistance provided by the Habsburgs remained comparatively small. This weakness was scarcely compensated by the fact that Ferdinand had obtained a cardinal's hat for the friar.

In November 1551, György Fráter set himself an exceedingly difficult task: to respond to the Turkish assault without seriously provoking the Sublime Porte. Assembling all available troops, including Castaldo's mercenaries and the auxiliary units of the {1-627.} Hungarian feudal estates, he set off for Lippa. Mehmed claimed earlier that he had not intended to occupy the town, but that the predominantly Serbian townsfolk had invited him in. The Turkish garrison soon surrendered, and the regent, overriding the protests of his lieutenants, allowed them to leave freely.

Ferdinand I had always suspected that Transylvania's uncrowned ruler might be drawing his armies into a trap. There was little ambiguity in the order he gave to Castaldo at the start of the campaign: 'Should you become convinced that [the friar's] actions will clearly bring harm to us, we allow and order you to deal with him in accordance with the interests of our country and its loyal subjects. It is your duty to apply our will in this matter.'[6] The mercenary officers feared for their lives in Transylvania; their fear was accentuated by the hatred that Nádasdy (the Lord Chief Justice was the brother-in-law of István Maylád!) and his companions bore for the friar and by their constant exposure to the Ottomans. Moreover, the officers suspected that the freeing of Lippa's defenders and the assignment of mercenary soldiers to winter quarters in Transylvanian villages were but the prelude to some sinister plot against them. While awaiting the Ottomans' reaction, György Fráter tried to dispel these unfounded fears, and he even dismissed his bodyguards. That gesture, however, sealed the friar's fate, for the commander of the Habsburg troops, Castaldo, promptly exploited what he saw as a favourable opportunity.

Sforza Pallavicini received the order to put Castaldo's plan into action. Marc Antonio Ferrari, who earlier had served as secretary to the regent's council, and was, since mid-1551, Castaldo's personal secretary, provided the necessary intelligence. It was also Ferrari who mounted the ambush at Alvinc, where, on the night of 15–16 December 1551, György Fráter, regent of Transylvania and Cardinal of the Roman Catholic Church, was brutally murdered.

There is ample evidence that Ferdinand knew and approved of the plot. The decision of the friar-regent to invite the Habsburgs {1-628.} into his country was clearly ill-conceived, and if he had any intention to rectify the mistake, it was aborted by his assassination at Alvinc. As for Ferdinand, the act only betrayed his impotence: unable to give Transylvania adequate assistance, he got rid of the man who might have been able to draw the appropriate conclusions from that impotence. Thus the fate of Eastern Hungary remained unresolved in 1551.

While Castaldo reannexed Transylvania and the Tisza region to Habsburg Hungary, the sultan, feeling betrayed and incensed at the territorial gains made by his enemies, sent his armies against Hungary's frontier defences in 1552. Ferdinand and his realm proved to be totally unprepared for this foreseeable assault. Several of Hungary's peripheral fortresses fell in the course of the campaign, including Veszprém, Drégely, Szolnok, Lippa, Temesvár, Karánsebes and Lugos. Only Eger castle, whose defense was led by István Dobó, withstood the besieging Ottomans.

The Ottomans's biggest gains were along the southeastern defences of the former Szapolyai realm: the entire Temesköz, Arad county, and the lower reaches of the Maros River. The mercenary forces showed cowardice; Captain Aldana's Spanish garrison at Lippa simply took to its heels. István Losonci's death when Temesvár fell only confirmed the futility of self-sacrificing resistance.

Meanwhile, Transylvania's three 'nations' had given repeated evidence of their indifference toward the state that had just collapsed. The Saxons had obtained the right to pay their taxes independently of the Transylvanian diet and excluded themselves from the voivode's sphere of authority. The Székelys sought to recover their tax-free status. All three 'nations' insisted on raising their own, separate defences against external threat. In order to forestall a potentially hostile coalition, Ferdinand I forbade the feudal estates to convene their diets. The aristocrats from the region east of the Tisza and the Tisza region thereupon began to attend diets {1-629.} convened in Western Hungary; in their view, the king had changed, but their country endured.

The Hungarians' spirits, already low after the Turkish successes in 1552, fell even more when the Sublime Porte began to intervene overtly in their domestic affairs. Firmans from the sultan, along with letters from Romanian rulers and Turkish beys in border provinces, enjoined the Transylvanians to invite Isabella and her son to return. Already, in 1552, the cowed Transylvanian diet had decided to continue payment of the 10,000-forint tribute. Castaldo and the voivode appointed by Ferdinand, András Báthori of Ecsed, protested, but in vain: Péter Haller, the onetime leader of the Saxon opposition, volunteered to take charge of the negotiations. At the talks, which began in the autumn of 1552, Haller went so far as to promise that if the sultan handed back the Temesköz, the Transylvanians would get rid of the German troops and elect a new voivode.

For the time being, that proposal had no consequences, and most people continued to draw some reassurance from Ferdinand's promises. Only the aristocrats in the most vulnerable region, the southern part of the region east of the Tisza, rebelled against the defenceless state: in the summer of 1553, they convened at an impromptu diet in Kereki and invited Queen Isabella to return; they also addressed a plea for help to the pasha in Buda. Accompanied by a small force of cavalry, Péter Petrovics hurried to join the Kereki rebels, who included Kelemen Ártándy, Ferenc Patócsy, and Gábor Bethlen. They found a few supporters in Transylvania as well, notably Antal Kendi and Kristóf Hagymássy, and the Székelys showed some interest in rallying to the cause.

By this time, Castaldo's government was on the brink of collapse. In 1552, his mercenary soldiers, deprived of battle and paid irregularly, aggravated their ill repute by looting towns and putting them to the torch. Instead of trying to restore public confidence, the bewildered general engineered the assassination of Ştefan Rareş, {1-630.} Moldavia' voivode. In early 1553, the king recalled Castaldo and withdrew the mercenaries from Transylvania, concluding that they did more to impede than to help the restoration of order. Involved in yet another Persian campaign, the Ottomans were unwilling to back the rebellion headed by Petrovics and Patócsy; it was suppressed by the new voivodes, Ferenc Kendi and the hero of Eger, István Dobó.

However, the sultan did not give up his goal of regaining control over Transylvania. The 1552 campaign had shown that the balance of power in the contested Danubian region was unchanged: although the Ottomans were unquestionably superior in tactics, they remained unable to break through the Habsburgs' defences in Hungary. The latest Persian campaign soon came to an end, and, in the summer of 1554, the Ottomans launched another offensive in Hungary, occupying Salgó and Fülek. In the meantime, a new envoy arrived from Istanbul to demand that Transylvania's three nations recall the Szapolyai royals. To press the point, Suleiman handed back Lugos and Karánsebes to Péter Petrovics; Ferdinand, meanwhile, still could not deliver adequate assistance. Acknowledging its impotence, Vienna paid Transylvania's tribute to the Porte and initiated new talks aiming at a peace treaty.

The sultan was willing to consider the proposal on condition that the Habsburgs give up Transylvania. His reply, delivered to Vienna's envoys, Antal Verancsics and the knight Busbecq, gave Ferdinand until November 1555 to make up his mind. Meanwhile, a firman issued on 7 October 1555 threatened the Transylvanians with an invasion if they did not call back the son of King John.

The Romanian principalities prepared for war, as did the Turkish garrisons in the Great Plain. At the instigation of Péter Petrovics, rebellion erupted once again in the region east of the Tisza. The Transylvanian diet, convened on 23 December 1555 at Marosvásárhely, sent un unambiguous message to the king: 'We were pleased to have a Christian ruler and links to the Holy Roman {1-631.} Emperor, but it was not God's will that this should endure, for we fear the enemy: it is near, has great numbers and might, and now that it is free of its Asian problems, it threatens us with all the power at its disposal. The enemy has warned us that our country will be put to fire and sword, and that we, our women, our children, our families will be exterminated. Those who witnessed the fall of Lippa and Temesvár know that this threat is genuine. We therefore ask that you either provide assistance sufficient to let us prevail against Suleiman, or release us from our oath.'[7]

In fact, they did not really expect to get an answer. The Hungarian captain general, Menyhárt Balassa, convened another diet at the end of January 1556, in Torda. It was no secret that the meeting was scheduled to declare secession. The voivodes Kendi and Dobó tried to restrain a few influential men by bribing them with gifts, but in vain. The participants, mainly Székelys and Hungarians, called for the return of Isabella and her son and invited Péter Petrovics to lead his forces into Transylvania. The next diet, convened by Péter Petrovics on March 12 at Szászsebes, adopted the definitive resolution: 'On this day we have by our common will elected the son of our late King John as our Prince and King, and we will loyally serve his majesty and master now and in times to come.'[8]

Envoys were dispatched to bring back the dowager queen and her son. They headed for Cracow, Poland's royal seat, since Vienna had not even bothered to detain Isabella in Oppeln. The promise of the Silesian principalities had come with such miserly conditions that the queen preferred to seek shelter with her younger brother, Sigismund August, King of Poland.

On June 14, while the Transylvanian lords were enjoying a predictably warm welcome at the Cracow court, Ferdinand I wrote to the sultan announcing that he would give back Transylvania to John Sigismund. As usual, he backed down too late. As early as May, the forces of Buda's pasha, Khadim Ali, had laid siege to {1-632.} Szigetvár. Isabella and John Sigismund set off and made a ceremonial entry in Kolozsvár on October 22. Péter Petrovics and Menyhárt Balassa, assisted by Romanian auxiliary troops, proceeded to occupy one after another of the royal fortresses. Gyulafehérvár and Gyalu were the first to surrender, and Pál Bornemissza, whom Ferdinand had appointed Bishop of Transylvania back in 1551, was put to flight. The Romanians turned homeward, but Déva, Fogaras, Bethlen, Huszt, and the Saxon towns soon followed suit in raising the Szapolyai banner. Significant resistance was largely limited to the region east of the Tisza; Várad's isolated garrison held out until April 1557, while Gyula castle fell only in 1566, and then, to the Ottomans. In Transylvania, István Dobó once again lived up to his reputation as Hungary's most valiant captain with his defence of Szamosújvár, but he too had to acknowledge the futility of resistance and surrender in November 1556. In the northeast, Gömör and Torna counties were taken into the Szapolyai camp by Ferenc Bebek, Abaúj and Zemplén by Gábor Perényi, and Sáros by György Tárczay. Thus the Szapolyais' realm was recreated, and with some hope of being self-sustaining, for internal forces as well as external factors militated in favour of its survival.
 

Kryvonis

Цензор
'Prince' John Sigismund and 'Voivode' Stephen Báthori
http://mek.niif.hu/03400/03407/html/103.html
Political developments in the decades after 1556 bore great similarity to those between 1526 and 1551. King Ferdinand reacted belligerently to Isabella's return, and the war lasted, with occasional pauses, until the mid-1570s.

In 1557, the aristocrats in the Upper-Tisza region who rallied to the House of Szapolyai gained control of the most important royal fortresses, those at Várad, Huszt, and Tokaj. Only Gyula and Világos managed to hold out. Two counter-attacks by General Puchaim brought only minor successes, in Zemplén county. Isabella's realm once again extended as far as Kassa. However, at the end of 1557, thanks mainly to the efforts of the captain-general {1-633.} of Upper Hungary, Imre Telekessy, the initiative passed to Ferdinand's supporters.

After 31 January 1559, when King Ferdinand concluded an armistice with the Ottomans, the fighting became less intense in Transylvania, but the lull was short-lived. The death of Queen Isabella on 15 November set off a new wave of hostilities. Kassa's captain-general, Ferenc Zay, persuaded Menyhárt Balassa, Isabella's captain-general for Hungary, to change sides. This notorious act of betrayal was followed by many aristocrats from the Upper-Tisza region. As a result, by the end of 1561, Gyulafehérvár's effective authority did not reach beyond the counties of Bihar and Máramaros counties — with one noteworthy, and more distant exception, Munkács castle. Over the next few years, a few castles — notably Szatmár, Tokaj, and Nagybánya — did change hands, but the fighting brought no major territorial change. On two occasions, after the forces of 'John II' were defeated at Hadad on 4 March 1562, and during General Schwendi's offensive in the summer of 1565, it seemed that the Habsburg camp might threaten the survival of the Szapolyai state. By 1566, the sultan's armies were once again on the move in Hungary, and the new Habsburg monarch, Maximilian I (1564-1576), learned the same lesson as his father: the fortunes of war in Hungary could always be altered by the Ottomans' military might. In 1566, Suleiman the Magnificent lost his life in the siege of Szigetvár. In 1567, the brave Schwendi managed to invest Munkács. Finally, on 17 February 1568, a peace treaty was signed at Adrianople (Drinápoly), bringing two and a half decades of relative calm to war-weary Hungary; the treaty had the effect of turning any attempt against the Szapolyais into a risky provocation.

Hostilities ceased during the ensuing diplomatic parleys. On 10 March 1571, Emperor Maximilian got Transylvania's lords to ratify the Speyer peace treaty. The terms of that treaty applied only to the Szapolyai dynasty, and John Sigismund died on March 14, but when Stephen (István) Báthori was chosen to succeed him, {1-634.} Maximilian dared not to intervene directly. He did try indirectly to alter the course of events in Transylvania by turning a blind eye to the activities of Kassa's captain-general, Johann Rueber. When Gáspár Bekes, who contested the Hungarian throne and colluded with Vienna, was defeated on 10 July 1575 at Kerelőszentpál, this kind of covert intervention came to an end.

The latest, bloody wars had shifted the battlefront eastward, but otherwise produced no clear-cut results. The situation was reminiscent of that before György Fráter's demise. There is a striking, and almost tragicomic, similarity between the protracted peace talks that ran concurrent with the fighting and the course of events prior to 1551.

The Speyer Treaty, much like the earlier Várad accord, endorsed the principle of a united Hungary. To be sure, 'John II' surrendered the title of king that he had received from his father and György Fráter, and contented himself with being qualified Prince (princeps, Fürst) 'John Sigismund', a title that could be passed on to his male heirs. The treaty provided that if he abdicated or lost his realm, he would receive as compensation the Silesian principalities of Oppeln and Ratibor. The Speyer Treaty was to be kept strictly secret. The stillborn Szatmár accord, signed by John Sigismund and Maximilian in 1565, was also supposed to be kept secret, but the emperor had divulged it to the Sublime Porte in the hope that fear of Turkish retaliation would bring the Transylvanians to heel — much as his father had done in 1540. But the case of the Speyer Treaty, Maximilian abided by the provision of secrecy.

The new state's international status remained marked by uncertainty even after the conclusion of the Speyer Treaty. Only the Porte, Poland, and France had recognized the sovereignty of Isabella and, later, of John Sigismund. The state had no name. Its rulers adopted the title of Hungarian King: Isabella's formal qualification was 'Queen of Hungary', and that of John Sigismund, 'John II, elected King of Hungary'. For a long time, Stephen {1-635.} Báthori was acknowledged abroad (except in Istanbul) simply as voivode. France's occasional offers of assistance were insubstantial, and of little consequence, although in 1555–56, Paris was actively involved in facilitating Isabella's return. The Romanian principalities served mainly to put external pressure on Transylvania. In 1556, the rulers of Moldavia and Wallachia, Alexandru Lăpuşneanu and Pătraşcu, acted on Turkish instructions to attack Transylvania, thus facilitating Péter Petrovics's venture. On the other hand, in 1561, Jakab Heraklides — of Greek origin, he had benefited from the Habsburgs' help to become Moldavia's voivode, and came to the known as the 'despotic voivode' (Despot vodă) — gave assistance to Balassa and his associates in their rebellion.

The Ottomans' attitude toward Hungary remained unaltered. They considered that Eastern Hungary was essentially in their domain, and that those who ruled there did so on sufferance. Accordingly, the sultan would exact tribute and insist that the Hungarian ruler could govern only after he had the sultan's assent, which in written form was called an athname. Suleiman's athname for John II was couched in exactly the same terms as the letter of alliance sent to King John in February 1528. When Stephen Báthori was elected, the Porte's emissary, a Hungarian renegade named Amhát, was waiting in the wings with a firman that had been drafted in Istanbul and which the prescient Ottomans had already addressed to Báthori. The text was new, and the tone commanding, but the essence was the same:

'Stephen Báthori, Transylvania's voivode! [...] Transylvania has been under my protection for a long time. I regard it in the same way as my other possessions, and give it the same protection against all enemies. My will is that all feudal lords, officials, fortresses, towns, palaces, fortifications, villages, provinces, prisons, and municipalities be kept in the same state and order as before; whatever belongs to {1-636.} Transylvania, whether in Hungary or Transylvania, belongs to my empire [...]

Therefore, exercising my authority, I grant to you, in accordance with your loyalty toward me, the country of Transylvania. [...]

In keeping with your loyalty toward me, you must be at one with your lords and reach peaceful agreement with them. [...]

'You must always act in concert with the beglerbeys of Buda and Temesvár, and thereby prevent the enemy from deceiving you.'[9]

Within these guidelines, the Ottomans continued to allow their Hungarian vassals to govern themselves freely. Their policy regarding Transylvania was driven by a single, and realizable objective: to prevent the reunification of Hungary. As long as the Szapolyai dynasty, and, later, Stephen Báthori and his successors avoided taking any steps in that direction, they were free to do as they wished.

When, in 1565, Vienna divulged to the Porte the secret of its agreement with John Sigismund, the young 'elected king' decided to personally pay his respects to the sultan and convince the latter, much as his father had done thirty years before, of his loyalty. Construing the attacks on Transylvania to be a breach of the peace treaty, the sultan led an army against Hungary. When John Sigismund hastened to Belgrade to meet the sultan, he was handed the above-noted athname. The Ottomans' punitive campaign touched only Habsburg Hungary; Szigetvár fell, and so did royal Hungary's last strongholds in the eastern Great Plain, at Gyula, Világos, and Jenő.

Everyone understood the full portent of the Ottoman reprisals. The Ottomans aimed to conquer Hungary, and the goodwill that they professed toward Gyulafehérvár was no more than a tactical element in their strategy. Occasionally, as a great favour, they would throw back a crumb from their booty. Thus, in 1554, {1-637.} Petrovics got Lugos and Karánsebes, and, a few years later, the small fort at Deszni, Zaránd county, was returned to John Sigismund. None of this stopped the Ottomans from pressing their claim (much as in 1546–51) to Transylvania's major border forts, at Lugos, Sebes, Várad, Kereki and Sarkad — in 1556–57, when Ferenc Bebek was intriguing against Isabella, and subsequently, when Gáspár Bekes responded positively in the hope of winning their support.

The disappearance of the Szapolyai dynasty led to a palpable change in the Ottomans' policy toward Transylvania. At first sight, the change did not seem significant, for it did not affect basic principles. In March 1572, Sultan Selim II (1566–1574) solemnly notified Stephen Báthori that he recognized the latter as successor to King John and John Sigismund, thus as a ruler with full royal prerogatives. But even at the time, the more vigilant observers saw an ill omen in the Porte's attempt to expand the frontier zone — taxed by both sides — at the expense of Transylvania. Another, ostensibly minor change was that the sultan's court officials, from chief pashas down to interpreters, began to demand personal gifts of greater value than before. Sometimes, they merely evoked a practice dating from the 'late King John', but at other times, they brazenly demanded that the gifts match the value of those flowing in from the two Romanian principalities. The Ottomans showed their true colours in 1576, when Murad III acceded to the throne and not only reiterated a demand for the border fortresses but also increased by 5000 forints the annual tribute from Transylvania. Báthori did not have the slightest intention of raising a protest, and even so, he was sent a reminder that the Porte could have got greater benefits if it had chosen to support Gáspár Bekes.

In fact, the former pretender Gáspár Bekes had gone into exile, and a few years later, he would do battle in Poland as Báthori's bravest general. However, from that time onward, the sultan would routinely hold in reserve, in Istanbul, an alternative candidate for {1-638.} prince of Transylvania. From 1580 to the time of the Fifteen-Years' War, this shameful role was played by renegade Hungarian aristocrat, Pál Márkházi. Thus Transylvania was being prepared for the servitude that characterized the Romanian voivodeships, and the Ottomans exploited every opportunity move closer to that objective.

Báthori did all in his power to prevent such opportunities from arising. He paid the higher tribute, made sure that the troops in the border forts stayed clear of Turkish territory, and pursued the Moldavian voivode, Bogdan, when the latter was exiled by the Ottomans.

Clearly, the development of Eastern Hungary, now called Transylvania, remained constrained by the interests and demands of its two mighty neighbours. And yet, its history took a significantly different turn after 1556.
 
Верх