ДНК-генеалогия

asan-kaygy

asan-kaygy

Цензор
Выборка 115 образцов из ФТДНА
R1a – 45 %,
С2 – 29 % (Из них С2-F1756-13 %, С2-F4002-15 %)
R1b – 7 %
O – 7 %
N – 4 %
J – 4 %
Остальные – 4 %.
 
H

Hsimriks

Пропретор
А кто это? :huh: Киргизы?
unsure.gif
 
asan-kaygy

asan-kaygy

Цензор
ПалеоДНк из Китая
Жужани
ПалеоДНк по жужаням
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ajpa.23491

The genome of an ancient Rouran individual reveals an important paternal lineage in the Donghu population

Jiawei Li, Ye Zhang, Yongbin Zhao, Yongzhi Chen, A. Ochir, Sarenbilige, Hong Zhu, Hui Zhou

First published: 21 April 2018
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23491

Abstract

Objectives

Following the Xiongnu and Xianbei, the Rouran Khaganate (Rouran) was the third great nomadic tribe on the Mongolian Steppe. However, few human remains from this tribe are available for archaeologists and geneticists to study, as traces of the tombs of these nomadic people have rarely been found. In 2014, the IA‐M1 remains (TL1) at the Khermen Tal site from the Rouran period were found by a Sino‐Mongolian joint archaeological team in Mongolia, providing precious material for research into the genetic imprint of the Rouran.

Materials and methods

The mtDNA hypervariable sequence I (HVS‐I) and Y‐chromosome SNPs were analyzed, and capture of the paternal non‐recombining region of the Y chromosome (NRY) and whole‐genome shotgun sequencing of TL1 were performed. The materials from three sites representing the three ancient nationalities (Donghu, Xianbei, and Shiwei) were selected for comparison with the TL1 individual.

Results

The mitochondrial haplotype of the TL1 individual was D4b1a2a1. The Y‐chromosome haplotype was C2b1a1b/F3830 (ISOGG 2015), which was the same as that of the other two ancient male nomadic samples (ZHS5 and GG3) related to the Xianbei and Shiwei, which were also detected as F3889; this haplotype was reported to be downstream of F3830 by Wei et al. (2017).

Discussion

We conclude that F3889 downstream of F3830 is an important paternal lineage of the ancient Donghu nomads. The Donghu‐Xianbei branch is expected to have made an important paternal genetic contribution to Rouran. This component of gene flow ultimately entered the gene pool of modern Mongolic‐ and Manchu‐speaking populations.
 
asan-kaygy

asan-kaygy

Цензор
asan-kaygy сказал(а):
ПалеоДНк из Китая
Жужани
ПалеоДНк по жужаням
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ajpa.23491

The genome of an ancient Rouran individual reveals an important paternal lineage in the Donghu population

Jiawei Li, Ye Zhang, Yongbin Zhao, Yongzhi Chen, A. Ochir, Sarenbilige, Hong Zhu, Hui Zhou

First published: 21 April 2018
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23491

Abstract

Objectives

Following the Xiongnu and Xianbei, the Rouran Khaganate (Rouran) was the third great nomadic tribe on the Mongolian Steppe. However, few human remains from this tribe are available for archaeologists and geneticists to study, as traces of the tombs of these nomadic people have rarely been found. In 2014, the IA‐M1 remains (TL1) at the Khermen Tal site from the Rouran period were found by a Sino‐Mongolian joint archaeological team in Mongolia, providing precious material for research into the genetic imprint of the Rouran.

Materials and methods

The mtDNA hypervariable sequence I (HVS‐I) and Y‐chromosome SNPs were analyzed, and capture of the paternal non‐recombining region of the Y chromosome (NRY) and whole‐genome shotgun sequencing of TL1 were performed. The materials from three sites representing the three ancient nationalities (Donghu, Xianbei, and Shiwei) were selected for comparison with the TL1 individual.

Results

The mitochondrial haplotype of the TL1 individual was D4b1a2a1. The Y‐chromosome haplotype was C2b1a1b/F3830 (ISOGG 2015), which was the same as that of the other two ancient male nomadic samples (ZHS5 and GG3) related to the Xianbei and Shiwei, which were also detected as F3889; this haplotype was reported to be downstream of F3830 by Wei et al. (2017).

Discussion

We conclude that F3889 downstream of F3830 is an important paternal lineage of the ancient Donghu nomads. The Donghu‐Xianbei branch is expected to have made an important paternal genetic contribution to Rouran. This component of gene flow ultimately entered the gene pool of modern Mongolic‐ and Manchu‐speaking populations.
Нажмите, чтобы раскрыть...
От Дмитрия Адамова: По аутосомам образец TL1 оказался близок к современным якутам...

Principal component analysis showed that the ancient TL1 individual
mainly clustered with the East Asia populations, being located closer to
modern Mongola (ethnic Mongols from southern parts of Hulunbuir)
and Yakut than the others (Figure 2). Admixture analysis at K59 (Supporting
Information S7), where we projected the TL1 individual based
on modern reference data, revealed that the TL1 individual was similar
to other East Asia samples predominantly exhibiting a mint green component
and a small amount of violet. In addition, cluster analysis (Figure
3a) generated by Admixture for the TL1 individual and modern Asians
(K53) shown that the Central South Asia populations were mainly
composed of blue group while green group mainly occupied East Asia
samples. The TL1 individual was most similar to Yakut people predominantly
exhibiting red group, followed by Oroqen, Daur, Hezhen, and
Mongola. Using the probabilistic model of population splits and divergence
implemented in TreeMix, we found that the TL1 individual was
very close to the Yakut and Oroqen (Figure 3b). The f3 analyses (Mbuti;
East Asia, ancient), which quantified the amount of shared genetic drift
between the Eastern Asia individuals and the ancient TL1 individual
since they diverged from an African outgroup Mbuti, showed that the
highest amount of shared drift with the TL1 individual came from Oroqen,
followed by Daur (Figure 3c).
 
asan-kaygy

asan-kaygy

Цензор
Благодаря докладу Афанасьева Г.Е. на «Крупновских чтениях» стала известна принадлежность некоторых образцов:


Номер Могильник Погребение Дата Культура Пол мт ДНК Y-ДНК
DA134 Чеботарев V Кург.1-п.2 82 г. Сарматская муж. I1 ?
DA141 Несветай II Кург.33-п.1 I в. Сарматская муж. A+152+16362 ?
DA145 Камышеватский X Кург.2-п.1 I в. Сарматская муж. U2e1h R
DA143 Несветай IV Кург.3-п.1 I в. Сарматская жен. U4b1a4 -
DA144 Чеботарев V Кург.6-п.1 I в. Сарматская муж. H28 R1
DA139 Чеботарев V Кург.1-п.1 I в. Сарматская жен. U2e1h -
DA136 Несветай II Кург.37-п.1 I в. Сарматская муж. A+152+16362 R1
DA142 Несветай II Кург.2-п.2 I в. Сарматская муж. R1
DA162 Бесланский Кат.439 II-IV вв. Аланская муж. H13a2c ?
DA243 Левоподкумский I П1/2 482 г. Аланская муж. W1 R1
DA161 Архонский Кат.11 VI-VIII вв. Аланская муж. X2f ?
DA146 Дагомский Кат.18-п.3 VII-VIII вв. Аланская жен. HV2a1 -
DA160 Дагомский Кат.15 VII-VIII вв. Аланская жен. U4d3 -
DA188 Подгоровский Кат.12-п.1 900 г. Салтовская муж. I5a4 ?
DA189 Дмитровский Кат.172-п.2 VIII-IX вв. Салтовская муж. J1b4 R1
DA190 Дмитровский Кат.171-п.1 733 г. Салтовская муж. U1a1c1 ?
DA164 Змейский Кат.182-п.2 X-XIV вв. Аланская жен. H5 -
DA183 Змейский РI-кат.23-п.2 X-XIV вв. Аланская муж. J1c11a ?
DA182 Змейский РI-кат.12-п.3 X-XIV вв. Аланская муж. U5a ?


Тут образцы недотипированные, так что сверяйтесь с таблицей, которую в этой теме выкладывали.
Нажмите, чтобы раскрыть...
 
asan-kaygy

asan-kaygy

Цензор
Аланы
DA162 Бесланский Кат.439 II-IV вв. Аланская муж. H13a2c ? соответ. DA162 Q-YP4000 Q-YP4000
DA190 Дмитровский Кат.171-п.1 733 г. Салтовская муж. U1a1c1 ? соответ. DA190 G-Z6653 G-Z6653
DA161 Архонский Кат.11 VI-VIII вв. Аланская муж. X2f ? соответ. DA161 Q-L330 Q-L330
Нажмите, чтобы раскрыть...
 
asan-kaygy

asan-kaygy

Цензор
Афанасьев Г. Некоторые дополнения к исторической интерпретации новых генетических исследований сармато-аланских образцов // Кавказ в системе культурных связей Евразии в древности и Средневековье. XXX "Крупновские чтения". Карачаевск. 2018. С. 284-289.

https://www.academia.edu/36600821/Афанасьев...018._С._284-289
 
asan-kaygy

asan-kaygy

Цензор
Выжимка со статьи. Перепост с Евразики
DA224 Besynshitobe, excavation 1, layer 3, grave 3 with knife, year 2015 1531 OutTurk Central steppe Male J
DA86 Kurgan nr. 16 (human (warrior) buried together with horse), Boz-Adyr 1468 Turk Tian Shan Male Q-L715
DA228 Bt, 2015, area 1, element 1, layer 3, skeleton 6 1400-1100 Turk Central steppe Male O-F714
DA89 Berygavoya, 1991, Pavlodar 1246 Turk Central steppe Male R1b1b

DA142 Nomad13, Kamyshevahsky X 1400-1100 Nomad_Med Caspian steppe Male R-Z2124
DA124 Issyk City, Tian Shan 1271 Nomad_Med Tian Shan Male J-PF4993
DA93 Spartak, kurgan 1, burial 4, Pavlodar 1129 Nomad_Med Central steppe Male R-Y14051
DA94 Spartak, kurgan 1, burial 5, Pavlodar 1129 Nomad_Med Central steppe Male R1b1b
DA126 Almaly, Kurgan 1, Object 1, Issyk, Tian Shan 985 Nomad_Med Tian Shan Male R-CTS6

DA87 Grigorjevka 4, Burial 1, Pavlodar 1280 Kimak Central steppe Male R-Y14051

DA179 Nurataldy 2, kurgan 2 1000-800 Kipchak Central steppe Male G-PH1780
DA23 Lisakovsk I, Kipchak 851 Kipchak Central steppe Male C-Y11990

DA222 Butakty 1 settlement 1200-1000 Karluk Tian Shan Male J-Z7706
DA230 Butakty 1 settlement 1200-1000 Karluk Tian Shan Male J-Z7706

DA203 Cemetery Butakty 1, grave 25 1000-700 Karakhanid Central steppe Male J-Z7706
DA204 Butakty 1, grave 34 940 Karakhanid Central steppe Male J-Y14698


DA28 Karasuyr, Burial 2, Bedpakdala, Karasuyr 700 GoldenHordeAsian Central steppe Male C-Y4541
DA29 Karasuyr, Burial 5, Bedpakdala, Karasuyr 700 GoldenHordeEuro Central steppe Male R-YP575
DA106 Kurgan nr. 28,Boz-Adyr 739 Nomad_Med Tian Shan Male C-Y12825

DA117 Kurgan nr. 31, Boz-Adyr 145 Nomad_His Tian Shan Male R1b
DA207 Konyrtebe settlement, Skeleton 3 300-100 Kazakh_His Central steppe Male
DA208 Konyrtebe settlement, Skeleton 2 300-100 Kazakh_His Central steppe Male R1
 
asan-kaygy

asan-kaygy

Цензор
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/05/16/322347

The genetic prehistory of the Greater Caucasus

Chuan-Chao Wang, Sabine Reinhold Reinhold, Alexey Kalmykov, Antje Wissgott, Guido Brandt, Choongwon Jeong, Olivia Cheronet, Matthew Ferry, Eadaoin Harney, Denise Keating, Swapan Mallick, Nadin Rohland, Kristin Stewardson, Anatoly R. Kantorovich, Vladimir E. Maslov, Vladimira G. Petrenko, Vladimir R. Erlikh, Biaslan C. Atabiev, Rabadan G. Magomedov, Philipp L. Kohl, Kurt W. Alt, Sandra L. Pichler, Claudia Gerling, Harald Meller, Benik Vardanyan, Larisa Yeganyan, Alexey D. Rezepkin, Dirk Mariaschk, Natalia Y. Berezina, Julia Gresky, Katharina Fuchs, Corina Knipper, Stephan Schiffels, Elena Balanovska, Oleg Balanovsky, Iain Mathieson, Thomas Higham, Yakov B. Berezin, Alexandra P. Buzhilova, Viktor Trifonov, Ron Pinhasi, Andrej B. Belinskiy, David Reich, Svend Hansen, Johannes Krause, Wolfgang Haak

doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/322347

Abstract

Archaeogenetic studies have described the formation of Eurasian 'steppe ancestry' as a mixture of Eastern and Caucasus hunter-gatherers. However, it remains unclear when and where this ancestry arose and whether it was related to a horizon of cultural innovations in the 4th millennium BCE that subsequently facilitated the advance of pastoral societies likely linked to the dispersal of Indo-European languages. To address this, we generated genome-wide SNP data from 45 prehistoric individuals along a 3000-year temporal transect in the North Caucasus. We observe a genetic separation between the groups of the Caucasus and those of the adjacent steppe. The Caucasus groups are genetically similar to contemporaneous populations south of it, suggesting that - unlike today - the Caucasus acted as a bridge rather than an insurmountable barrier to human movement. The steppe groups from Yamnaya and subsequent pastoralist cultures show evidence for previously undetected Anatolian farmer-related ancestry from different contact zones, while Steppe Maykop individuals harbour additional Upper Palaeolithic Siberian and Native American related ancestry.

Археогенетические исследования описывают формирование евразийского «степного генетического компонента» как смесь восточноевропейских и кавказских охотников-собирателей. Однако остается неясным, когда и где возник этот генетический компонент, и был ли он связан с горизонтом культурных инноваций в 4-м тысячелетии до нашей эры, которые впоследствии способствовали развитию скотоводческих обществ, вероятно, связанных с распространением индоевропейских языков. Для решения этой проблемы мы секвенировали широкогеномные данные 45 доисторических людей по 3000-летнему временному разрезу на Северном Кавказе. Мы наблюдаем генетическое разделение между группами Кавказа и прилегающей степи. Кавказские группы генетически похожи на современное население к югу от него, что говорит о том, что в отличие от сегодняшнего дня Кавказ выступал как мост, а не непреодолимый барьер для человеческого движения. Степные группы Ямной и последующих скотоводческих культур свидетельствуют о наличии ранее незамеченного Анатолийского земледельческого компонента из разных зон контакта, в то время как у степных майкопских особей есть дополнительный верхнепалеолитический компонент связанный с Сибирью и Америкой.
Нажмите, чтобы раскрыть...
 
Для ответа нужно войти/зарегистрироваться
Верх